Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

MREV+ Dyno Tested On The 287 HP Engine!

Old May 4, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #501  
OCG35Coupe's Avatar
OCG35Coupe
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Orange County CA
Default

Originally Posted by wren57
Well I was going to go ahead and install my lower plenum but have decided to wait a while. Even after sanding with 60, 100 and 200 grit sandpaper AND rubbing down the manifold hard with grade 4, 2, and 0 steel wool it still looks like crap... NOTHING like the smooth/shiny version shown on the website. I've contacted Hydrazine and am awaiting a response before installing. I've attached pictures of my manifold vs. the advertised manifold for reference; the first two pictures are my manifold, the third is what is advertised.

Look a little different to you?
Are the first two do it yoursel plenum mods?? Or is that what you recieved from Motordyne?
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:42 PM
  #502  
wren57's Avatar
wren57
Banned
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
From: I'm A Gypsy
Default

The other two are NOT DIY, they are pictures of the MREV+ (or whatever the f*ck it is called) lower 287 manifold after undergoing the MMP process by motordyne. I'm not very pleased with it as it looks nothing like the advertised manifold, even after I put about $15 in materials and 2 hours of work into it. I'm still awaiting a response from Motordyne.

ps- Please don't state things as facts unless you know what you are talking about.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:45 PM
  #503  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by wren57
The other two are NOT DIY, they are pictures of the MREV+ (or whatever the f*ck it is called) lower 287 manifold after undergoing the MMP process by motordyne. I'm not very pleased with it as it looks nothing like the advertised manifold, even after I put about $15 in materials and 2 hours of work into it. I'm still awaiting a response from Motordyne.

ps- Please don't state things as facts unless you know what you are talking about.
No offense, but your 1st post with teh pics was quite ambiguous about what was in the 1st two pics. You stated "your" and "my" lower plenum, not Motordyne's or the MREV+. I think that was the reason for some of the confusion.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #504  
wren57's Avatar
wren57
Banned
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
From: I'm A Gypsy
Default

Why the hell would I come into this thread and complain that a DIY manifold didn't look like the one on someone's website? Anyways, I went back and edited the original post in case there was any conphusssione.

And no offense taken or intended, I'm just a bit upset that what I spent a large amount of money on something that looks nothing like what it is advertised. I expect a BigMac to not look like the picture, but a $250+ car part should.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #505  
Z CRUZN's Avatar
Z CRUZN
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Default

Wren57's pics and original post made sense to me - oh well...........keep us filled in on what you learn. Definitely not looking right there....

Last edited by Z CRUZN; May 4, 2006 at 03:22 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #506  
ATL_Red_G35's Avatar
ATL_Red_G35
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
From: ATL
Default

Originally Posted by wren57
Why the hell would I come into this thread and complain that a DIY manifold didn't look like the one on someone's website? Anyways, I went back and edited the original post in case there was any conphusssione.

And no offense taken or intended, I'm just a bit upset that what I spent a large amount of money on something that looks nothing like what it is advertised. I expect a BigMac to not look like the picture, but a $250+ car part should.

WOW, I get it now. You bought MD's Lower Plenum, originally called MREV+. Came to you looking like crap and nothing like the pictures on their site.

And they didn't even get back with you about that? did they shipped out the wrong one, as in unfinished product?


How about other MREV owners? Did you start a NEW thread and asked them if they're experiencing the same?
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #507  
jmr0311's Avatar
jmr0311
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Grapevine, Texas
Default

Where is this "GROUP BUY" guys, I want to sign in for it. Please let me know immediately before it gets to late. Thanks very much ppl.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 03:54 PM
  #508  
amG35's Avatar
amG35
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Now the website in not working. All the orders must be clogging up the
works. Christmas is going to have to wait just a little longer.

Ok, site back up now.

Last edited by amG35; May 4, 2006 at 03:59 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 03:54 PM
  #509  
Sk8fe's Avatar
Sk8fe
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

See Post #477 (on page 24 for me)
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 04:04 PM
  #510  
amG35's Avatar
amG35
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by wren57
Well I was going to go ahead and install my lower plenum but have decided to wait a while. Even after sanding with 60, 100 and 200 grit sandpaper AND rubbing down the manifold hard with grade 4, 2, and 0 steel wool it still looks like crap... NOTHING like the smooth/shiny version shown on the website. I've contacted Hydrazine and am awaiting a response before installing. I've attached pictures of *edit* the manifold I recieved from motordyne */edit* vs. the advertised manifold for reference; the first two pictures are my manifold, the third is what is advertised.

Look a little different to you?

Looks like a great deal of difference. Will this affect performance? I will find out, order #101. Thanks Tony.

Last edited by amG35; May 4, 2006 at 04:48 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 04:29 PM
  #511  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
Thread Starter
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Originally Posted by wren57
Well I was going to go ahead and install my lower plenum but have decided to wait a while. Even after sanding with 60, 100 and 200 grit sandpaper AND rubbing down the manifold hard with grade 4, 2, and 0 steel wool it still looks like crap... NOTHING like the smooth/shiny version shown on the website. I've contacted Hydrazine and am awaiting a response before installing. I've attached pictures of *edit* the manifold I recieved from motordyne */edit* vs. the advertised manifold for reference; the first two pictures are my manifold, the third is what is advertised.

Look a little different to you?
WREN57,

What you have attached on the third picture to the right is not an MREV of any kind.
That's alberts (EK's) collector. You can see his pictures posted here.
https://my350z.com/forum/engine-drivetrain-and-forced-induction-diy/187392-diy-plenum-porting-3.html

What you posted is a picture from the PDF installation manual. Which definitly should not be construed as an advertisement. The picture was taken during an install for illustration purposes over a year ago. Alberts plenum is only polished. (not machined in any way like an MREV)

I'm sure there are many, many people on this board who have seen and can vouch that same picture has been in the manual since the very beginning of Motordyne plenum spacers and long before MREV was developed.

Sorry if you thought that polished plenum was in any way supposed to be an MREV. It is not.

But I see the problem now and will put in a new picture ASAP.

PS: In fact, Albert was the first person to do an independant dyno comparison of a early Crawford plenum (the polished CV4 shown shown in EK's attached pictures) and the MD 1/4" plenum spacer.
Both pre/post tests were performed on that polished lower plenum. Hence many pictures were taken during the installation process for documentation... the picture you posted was one of them.

PSS: What you recieved is exactly what Wired 24/7's dyno plots were made from. All the same machining, grinding and buffing processes are the same. So what you have is functionally identical.

Last edited by Hydrazine; May 4, 2006 at 05:18 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:01 PM
  #512  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
Thread Starter
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Originally Posted by jeeper78
It has been stated that the results of the MREV-2 were unacceptable when installed on a REVUP engine. Let's not forget that the MREV and MREV+ started out as mods for only REVUP engines... has it been shown yet that adding a spacer to the MREV-2 on a 300hp engine produces a more acceptable result? Will MREV+ still be offered for those with 300hp REVUP engines?

Also, I thought the whole point of these independent dynos was to verify that MREV-2 is better than MREV+... and yet (other than your own initial dyno) I don't think I've seen anything but a baseline dyno compared to MREV-2 with and without a spacer. Where are all the MREV-2 to MREV+ comparisons?
MREV+ was the modified lower plenum with a plenum spacer. MREV-2 has additional lower plenum modifications but no longer comes with a spacer.

The modified lower plenum has been purposly separated from automatically comming with a plenum spacer. The reason is that many will want the gains of a modified lower collector on their 287 engine but not want to install a plenum spacer.

MREV-2 is the first 100% stealth plenum mod and thus will have certaint advantageous traits for some people. In the case of the REVUP engine, all prior dynos of MREV+ have been with a plenum spacer.

When the whole MREV concept started, the very first dyno on a REVUP engine was the 287 lower collector without a spacer. The results were similar to MREV-2 in that it made very good midrange gains, but the loss up top was also too much. With the plenum spacer added, it was much better but it still lost around 2-5 horse power in the last 600 RPM.
When the MREV+ was developed, the last end of the RPM spectrum was brought up to to baseline value.

The new changes made to MREV-2 increase flow area to the entrance of the runner inlets even more than before.

I am also offering a $100 rebate (for a limited time) for dyno installations of the MREV-2 with a spacer on the REVUP engine.

If you have REVUP engine, you can dyno it or you can wait for others to post their results here first.

Tony

Last edited by Hydrazine; May 4, 2006 at 05:19 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #513  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
Thread Starter
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Originally Posted by Grommit
So can those of us in Southern California drop off our old lower plenum and pay/pick up the MREV2 some where? I don't want to go through the hassel of paying online, packing up my old plenum, shipping it off and then waiting for the refund.

Thanks!
Hi Grommit,

Yes, thats no problem at all.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #514  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
Thread Starter
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Originally Posted by pingbling23
So if you were to pick a setup wich one would it be, mrev 2, 5/16 spacer, or mrev 2 with 5/16 spacer. I want to buy this but im not sure if its worth the time and money.
From all the results so far, the MREV-2 mod tends to make more TQ and the spacer by itself tends to make more HP.

If you only go with one, the MREV-2 and 5/16" spacer are a close call but the MREV-2 makes a little more and also costs less.

Its also 100% stealth which is a nice feature to have.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:13 PM
  #515  
ct350z's Avatar
ct350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 15,716
Likes: 1
From: Miami, Florida
Default

hydrazine, im sorry for the dumb question but i dont want to go crazy looking through this whole thread for whp & tq gains with the mrev2 and 5/16 spacer on a 287vq motor. can you enlighten me? thanks
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #516  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
Thread Starter
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Right here.
https://my350z.com/forum/intake-exhaust/188419-mrev-v2-independent-dyno-tested-on-bone-stock-287hp-motor-wired-24-7-s-05-touring.html
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #517  
bilinghm's Avatar
bilinghm
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bilinghm
I'm curious what the guys who have purchased the Mrev+ think of this home made version. You guys have seen the design and workmanship of the top secret Mrev+, so how do they compare? I believe everyone following this thread would love some insights from you guys. Comments please.

From Hydrazine:

Getting closer!
That was an early version of MREV+.

There is still a ways to go.

Hint: Thinking out of the box can also mean thinking out of (or beyond one) dimension or axis.
__________________
http://www.MotordyneEngineering.com

I think you got some 'splaining to do Lucy. I don't think my DIY looks like an early version of THAT sad looking plenum. I think it's about time you cut the secrecy B.S. and show these people what the product that they are going to recieve actually looks like.
Attached Thumbnails MREV+ Dyno Tested On The 287 HP Engine!-finish5.jpg  
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #518  
Grommit's Avatar
Grommit
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Where do I drop off and pick up my new one? I have to pay cash, too. Let me know if that will be a problem.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:28 PM
  #519  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
Thread Starter
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Originally Posted by bilinghm
Quote:
Originally Posted by bilinghm
I'm curious what the guys who have purchased the Mrev+ think of this home made version. You guys have seen the design and workmanship of the top secret Mrev+, so how do they compare? I believe everyone following this thread would love some insights from you guys. Comments please.

From Hydrazine:

Getting closer!
That was an early version of MREV+.

There is still a ways to go.

Hint: Thinking out of the box can also mean thinking out of (or beyond one) dimension or axis.
__________________
http://www.MotordyneEngineering.com

I think you got some 'splaining to do Lucy. I don't think my DIY looks like an early version of THAT sad looking plenum. I think it's about time you cut the secrecy B.S. and show these people what the product that they are going to recieve actually looks like.
Yes, there is indeed more to the MREV-2. But by just looking at your attached picture, you "may" have removed a little too much off the top of runners 1&2.

EDIT: I'll release pictures when appropriate. The bottom line is that it makes the gains as shown in the dyno plots.

Last edited by Hydrazine; May 4, 2006 at 05:40 PM.
Reply
Old May 4, 2006 | 05:29 PM
  #520  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
Thread Starter
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Originally Posted by Grommit
Where do I drop off and pick up my new one? I have to pay cash, too. Let me know if that will be a problem.
Give me a PM.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:07 AM.