Mrev2 + Spacer = Omg
11-30-2006, 09:07 AM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Yes, for the 287 engine it is, but depending on where your A/F ratio is starting from, it may or may not run lean.
So it is best to know what your A/F ratio is before starting. If your A/F is at or below 13 its good to go. Otherwise the best results can be made with a tune to increase the fuel flow rate to compensate for the additional air flow.
I hope this answers your question.
Tony
So it is best to know what your A/F ratio is before starting. If your A/F is at or below 13 its good to go. Otherwise the best results can be made with a tune to increase the fuel flow rate to compensate for the additional air flow.
I hope this answers your question.
Tony
12-02-2006, 03:41 AM
#22
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: texas
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can this combo be used with force induction (supercharger)...???? thinking of getting supercharger (vortech) soon but still saving $$$.. i'm interested on installing these combo.. for sure i can afford this before christmas.. jes wanna know if i can use it with supercharger... don't want to waste money...
12-05-2006, 06:19 PM
#24
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
damn i just bought the mrev2 will be here on tuesday..reading this i gets me hyped! i cant wait i bought the aam plenum and the mrev2! yea!!!!! lol easy to install,yes?
12-06-2006, 02:42 PM
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Waynesville, NC
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PPW Z33
I know this has been covered so many times but I keep getting mixed responses, I know the 5/16 spacer is good for both but is the mrev2 with the spacer the optimal setup for the 287 hp?
12-06-2006, 08:59 PM
#27
Originally Posted by Rick06Z
Its the other way around. 287HP engine is best with spacer only (you already have the non-rev up lower plenum). MREV2 is for the rev-up and it s/b used with the spacer.
12-07-2006, 02:59 AM
#29
Registered User
Originally Posted by Abishop
No, the spacer is what gains most of your hp on a 287, only small gains with mrev. The Rev up gains more from MREV then spacer.
12-07-2006, 07:44 PM
#33
Hi guys,
On the 287 engine, for area under the curve, the MREV2 actually makes a little bit more than even the spacer. But the difference is pretty small.
The spacer makes about 1-2 HP more at the peak, but the MREV2 makes 1-2 more TQ with a little more midrange.
You could do either one and get pretty much the same results, they both predominantly add top end. There is a little bit of a trade off between them though.
1) the spacer has very good stealth and a little more bang for the buck.
2) the MREV2 has 100% stealth and a little more area under the curve.
And no matter what you do, if you have a REVUP engine, do both!
On the 287 engine, for area under the curve, the MREV2 actually makes a little bit more than even the spacer. But the difference is pretty small.
The spacer makes about 1-2 HP more at the peak, but the MREV2 makes 1-2 more TQ with a little more midrange.
You could do either one and get pretty much the same results, they both predominantly add top end. There is a little bit of a trade off between them though.
1) the spacer has very good stealth and a little more bang for the buck.
2) the MREV2 has 100% stealth and a little more area under the curve.
And no matter what you do, if you have a REVUP engine, do both!
12-07-2006, 08:02 PM
#34
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So on a 287 what could we expect in gains with Mrev2 + Spacer?
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Hi guys,
On the 287 engine, for area under the curve, the MREV2 actually makes a little bit more than even the spacer. But the difference is pretty small.
The spacer makes about 1-2 HP more at the peak, but the MREV2 makes 1-2 more TQ with a little more midrange.
You could do either one and get pretty much the same results, they both predominantly add top end. There is a little bit of a trade off between them though.
1) the spacer has very good stealth and a little more bang for the buck.
2) the MREV2 has 100% stealth and a little more area under the curve.
And no matter what you do, if you have a REVUP engine, do both!
On the 287 engine, for area under the curve, the MREV2 actually makes a little bit more than even the spacer. But the difference is pretty small.
The spacer makes about 1-2 HP more at the peak, but the MREV2 makes 1-2 more TQ with a little more midrange.
You could do either one and get pretty much the same results, they both predominantly add top end. There is a little bit of a trade off between them though.
1) the spacer has very good stealth and a little more bang for the buck.
2) the MREV2 has 100% stealth and a little more area under the curve.
And no matter what you do, if you have a REVUP engine, do both!
12-07-2006, 08:25 PM
#36
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
I posted dyno plots of it several months ago.
Assuming the A/F is within nominal, it made 2-6 HP at various parts of the curve.
Assuming the A/F is within nominal, it made 2-6 HP at various parts of the curve.
12-07-2006, 08:52 PM
#38
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks, we love having vendors like you around who make great products and are honest! helps when you have X-mas sales too!
keep up the good work
keep up the good work
Originally Posted by Hydrazine
Yes. But every car will work best with a little more or a little less. Only a careful tune will show exactly what is needed for your car.
Tony
Tony
