Notices
Motorsports The Z in its Natural Habitat

Sl500 A M G Vs. 350z?

 
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 12:20 PM
  #1  
cadeslade's Avatar
cadeslade
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa, Ca
Default Sl500 A M G Vs. 350z?

SL500 A M G VS. 350Z, Who would win?
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 12:21 PM
  #2  
m'sZ's Avatar
m'sZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

Is that a joke?
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 12:26 PM
  #3  
m'sZ's Avatar
m'sZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default

SL500 AMG (actually called SL55 AMG) puts out 490+hp and 500+ tq. It weighs a bit more, but with that kind of output, no chance.
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 12:31 PM
  #4  
cadeslade's Avatar
cadeslade
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa, Ca
Default

Ididn't Know, Just thought I would ask, thanks!
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 01:56 PM
  #5  
rouxeny's Avatar
rouxeny
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Default

Be very hesitant about racing anything that says AMG on it.

Especially in a straight line.

"Evo" magazine recently ran a comparison of a SL55 AMG vs a Caterham R300. Some numbers.

Caterham - track car, 1.8L 4 cyl, 160 hp but 333 hp/ton.

Benz - luxury sports car, 5.4L Supercharged V8, 500 hp, 516 lb/ft torque, 255 hp/ton.

.......................Caterham........................Benz
0-100-0_____16.68 sec____________14.80 sec
Slalom_______6.35 sec____________ 6.81 sec
0-60________4.4 sec______________4.6 sec
Price________22,400 British pounds___89,040 British pounds
1/4 mile______13.2 103 mph_________12.9 114 mph

Ouch! This is not a car to take on, don't bring a knife to a gunfight.

Last edited by rouxeny; Jan 10, 2003 at 01:59 PM.
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 05:08 PM
  #6  
cadeslade's Avatar
cadeslade
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa, Ca
Default

Yeah AMG is a pretty aggressive Mercedes Type, Lots Of Power
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 05:43 PM
  #7  
Moroccan_Mole's Avatar
Moroccan_Mole
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia, PA
Default

too bad there's no manual tranny :[
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 08:13 PM
  #8  
Maximam's Avatar
Maximam
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default Re: Sl500 A M G Vs. 350z?

Originally posted by cadeslade
SL500 A M G VS. 350Z, Who would win?
If you see one of these.......run!




Quote from R&T: How about 0-60 mph in 4.5 seconds with strong acceleration to 155 mph when the computer caps the power? AMG adds a high-pressure screw-type Lysholm supercharger with Teflon-coated rotors to pump out 11.6 psi of boost. Add the air/water intercooler, put the engine through the dyno test and up come 493 bhp at 6100 rpm and — sorry, Viper guys — 516 lb.-ft. of torque at 2650-4500 rpm.
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 03:56 PM
  #9  
cadeslade's Avatar
cadeslade
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa, Ca
Default

Too Bad there's No Manual Tranny, I guess....It's got the Sport Tronic like my Z, I guess it doesn't really matter when you got that much power, the germans obviously thought it was wise to put that type of tranny in there, They had a reason for doin it, It's a new technology, maybe the manual is being replaced by the dual transmission, I mean it's a $85-$130K Automobile for cryin out loud. Manual/SportTronic, who really cares, as long as it hauls *** do you really care?? I look at that transimission and mine as an upgrade and a great option for me. I only have one Car, I guess if I had two I probably would have got the Manual.
Old Jan 11, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #10  
Bobby C 01TA's Avatar
Bobby C 01TA
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
From: Dallas Tx
Default

LOL dam AMGs and Brabus Tuned Benz's freakin rock! I ran a couple on the hwy and hung for a bit and then those cars just start walkin me. My car is a lot better of a dead stop car..heres an example of how fast one of the AMG cars are.. I ran one dead stop on they hwy in the middle of the night and from dead stop to whatever.. he caught and passed me at 120 and it was over.. wayyy over and the 350z that I ran from my friend..I spotted him 4 cars and the jump and passed him in the middle of my 2nd gear and by 120 he was about 8 cars behind! no comparison
Old Jan 12, 2003 | 07:43 AM
  #11  
RUSSH's Avatar
RUSSH
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Cypress, TX
Default

12.9 from a supercharged 5.5L Not very impressive.
Old Jan 12, 2003 | 11:25 AM
  #12  
jigga's Avatar
jigga
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
From: In the slow lane
Default

Originally posted by badfkr98ss
12.9 from a supercharged 5.5L Not very impressive.
ummm...okay........


You did look at the weight of the thing did you not???????
Old Jan 12, 2003 | 12:48 PM
  #13  
Maximam's Avatar
Maximam
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Default

Originally posted by badfkr98ss
12.9 from a supercharged 5.5L Not very impressive.
What?

How about 493hp/516tq is that impressive?

I guess you think that is worse than a 8.3 ltr Viper at 500/525?

Is there a sport coupe convertable with a better 1/4 I'm not aware of?



I guess I just named it, although not the same car.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
Jan 2, 2022 12:58 PM
Dsowe
Exterior & Interior
15
Feb 17, 2021 10:38 AM
issyz
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
6
Jul 2, 2017 03:04 PM
nanotech
Exhaust
6
Oct 2, 2015 05:02 AM
samansharif
Brakes & Suspension
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:31 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 AM.