New dyno numbers: 294 rwhp
03-27-2008, 05:11 AM
#101
Professional
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Get back to the dyno and get that thing tuned. 
I would love to see your track numbers. Let me know if you ever come up to Ennis I would love to run against you.
>
I would love to see your track numbers. Let me know if you ever come up to Ennis I would love to run against you.>
03-27-2008, 05:30 AM
#102
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I just waiting for UpRev to get some time available on their dyno to finish tuning and get some current dyno numbers. I may go to the SAR this Friday but not 100% sure yet.
03-31-2008, 08:44 AM
#103
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by IntenseFab
Awesome! Well from the sounds of things you'd hang Stillen/HKS S/C Equipped Z's 
Last edited by BrazenZ; 04-01-2008 at 04:36 AM.
03-31-2008, 08:53 AM
#105
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kudos on the build up Rednezz. I would point out ( and correct me if am wrong) but those are dynojet engine graphs which usually run a little higher than DynoDynamics
Last edited by BrazenZ; 03-31-2008 at 08:59 AM.
03-31-2008, 11:23 AM
#107
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Fl
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BrazenZ
I don't think so. 305 rwhp/ 298 ft/lbs on a Dyno Dynamics loaded dyno.
or were they?
03-31-2008, 01:24 PM
#109
Originally Posted by IntenseFab
Any reason why you are running an N/A car excessively rich under WOT? 11.8 is quite a bit of fuel for no f/i. Tip in looks great but you are losing alot of power around 2100 RPM. Your graph should steadily increase and look alot less peaky.
03-31-2008, 05:55 PM
#110
Registered User
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: curl lookin boy
Posts: 8,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
Mine also ran extremly rich for being stock. I am in Texas as well, 93 octane and here is my graph below. I think it has something to do with the HR.
04-08-2008, 08:22 AM
#111
New Member
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by SOLO-350Z
Mine also ran extremly rich for being stock. I am in Texas as well, 93 octane and here is my graph below. I think it has something to do with the HR.
07-06-2008, 08:11 PM
#113
Very....
impressive. My plan has always been to try to take the car as far as possible NA. My bolt on power mods are tne Nismo CAI, Nismo Exhaust, MD 5/16th Spacer, Nismo Headers, Berk Metallic HFCs. The plan is to pick up some AMS racing pullies, Nismo camshafts and tune w/ U-tec.
I'm not exactly sure where I'll end up but I really enjoy the pursuit of squeezing everything out possible.
Well done.
I'm not exactly sure where I'll end up but I really enjoy the pursuit of squeezing everything out possible.
Well done.
07-07-2008, 08:03 AM
#115
Originally Posted by i8acobra
STD correction = overinflated numbers. Switch to SAE for more accurate numbers.
07-11-2008, 03:40 PM
#116
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Nm
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STD numbers are not always higher, it depends on ambient conditions, most namely, humidity. My STD numbers are typically LOWER than my SAE values. This is because I live in the desert, 8 -12% RH is common almost year 'round.
Lil' rundown on CF's:
Lil' rundown on CF's:
Originally Posted by Maxima.org Dude
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers), USA. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.23 InHg (99 kPa) of dry air and 77 F (25°C). This SAE standard requires a correction for friction torque. Friction torque can be determined by measurements on special motoring dynamometers (which is only practical in research environments) or can be estimated. When estimates must be used, the SAE standard uses a default Mechanical Efficiency (ME) value of 85%. This is approximately correct at peak torque but not at other engine operating speeds. Some dynamometer systems use the SAE correction factor for atmospheric conditions but do not take mechanical efficiency into consideration at all (i.e. they assume a ME of 100%).
STD or STP. Another power correction standard determined by the SAE. This standard has been stable for a long time and is widely used in the performance industry. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.92 InHg (103.3 kPa) of dry air and 60 F (15.5°C). Because the reference conditions include higher pressure and cooler air than the SAE standard, these corrected power numbers will always be about 4 % higher than the SAE power numbers. Friction torque is handled in the same way as in the SAE standard.
ECE (European Community), Europe. The ECE standard is based on the European Directives. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 99 kPa (29.23 InHg) of dry air and 25°C (77 F). Friction torque is not taken into consideration at all.
DIN (Deutsche Industrie Norm), Germany .
The DIN standard is determined by the German automotive industry. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 101.3 kPa (29.33 InHg) of dry air and 20°C (68 F). With the advent of European legislation and standards, national standards such as the DIN (formerly widely used) are now less significant.
Actual You may see this on some charts. What this means is this is the actual horsepower archived on the day tested and no correction factor has been applied. One can assume better or worse results with varying weather conditions.
STD or STP. Another power correction standard determined by the SAE. This standard has been stable for a long time and is widely used in the performance industry. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 29.92 InHg (103.3 kPa) of dry air and 60 F (15.5°C). Because the reference conditions include higher pressure and cooler air than the SAE standard, these corrected power numbers will always be about 4 % higher than the SAE power numbers. Friction torque is handled in the same way as in the SAE standard.
ECE (European Community), Europe. The ECE standard is based on the European Directives. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 99 kPa (29.23 InHg) of dry air and 25°C (77 F). Friction torque is not taken into consideration at all.
DIN (Deutsche Industrie Norm), Germany .
The DIN standard is determined by the German automotive industry. Power is corrected to reference conditions of 101.3 kPa (29.33 InHg) of dry air and 20°C (68 F). With the advent of European legislation and standards, national standards such as the DIN (formerly widely used) are now less significant.
Actual You may see this on some charts. What this means is this is the actual horsepower archived on the day tested and no correction factor has been applied. One can assume better or worse results with varying weather conditions.
Last edited by NmexMAX; 07-11-2008 at 04:20 PM.
08-01-2008, 09:52 AM
#119
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
Rednez - Was there any work done to the heads or were they used out of the box?
http://cosworthusa.com/store/pc/view...7&idproduct=69
(related)cool article...
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/te...ild/index.html
Zquicksilver
08-01-2008, 12:03 PM
#120
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks like the headers on the Cosworth motor look very similiar to the Nismo headers. My problem is the intake manifold. After 6300 rpm I just don't have enough air. I really wish I had a Cosworth intake manifold or anything better than I have now so I can take full advantage of my heads and cams. I'm sure I can pick up another 10+ rwhp.