SOLO-350Z

iTrader: (26)

Sad thing though is I am right until proven wrong.

RBlover69

iTrader: (2)

SO are we lmao solo


Until we have vids...forget the 1/4 i rather see some good ol street racing or some lap times around a course. I have seen 911 turbos run 13.9s because of a horrid driver we should really have some nice vids. I agree with the other poster here saying we should get some vids. Im telling you get one with a bolt on revup with a tune. Guarentee you uptop it wont be the margin of performance you think. Now with a 287 with every bolt on and a tune...get one from a dig...guarentee you with a stock HR whos whole shot will be very nice. I have seen these first had ..Guess its up to the vids to do the talking. Goodluck.

Now if someone here bought a 380RS or even mayeby the 3.7( but then the weight of the G comes into play)then i would say wholy molly that engines powerband is way above the 3.5 and literally there is no chance ..but the 3.5HR....besides the tq numbers peak numbers are atainable without cams on a revup one of our huge posters here has a revup with 290rwhp without cams . lol Its just not many people have built revups. And now everyone is going FI preety much , well at least from what i seen. from the few who actaully go the NA route.


Look at Z1s car his car will murder a HR granted his build is more then most but what you need to address is that you cant really expect a stock HR to beat all modified NA Zs.. I know the HR is a amazing motor but we dont need crazy compression and cams to beat a HR. But granted as more mods come out this may change.

07-Zman

Yeah, your probably right. I might have to plug up 3 holes to rip your ***! LOL

jfrlhobbs

I had never heard that before. So, what is the actual HP on the HR engine if 306hp is not it?

SniperHunter

iTrader: (9)

Well, it was originally listed as 313HP, but SAE made Nissan correct that.

RBlover69

iTrader: (2)

correct the revup motor was rated at 293 at the crank i beleive and 287 even lower.

gabez33

iTrader: (7)

hahaha whatever 3 holes, 5 holes how ever you can fix your retard mod. I got 1 for you, why do you get 2 real long dryer hoses and connect them to your TB's. Then have them run along the sides of your car, into the cabin, and connect it to you AC vent and run it on high...BOOOM! cold air intake!

gabez33

iTrader: (7)

I believe i read somewhere it was like 277 or something, might be wrong

RBlover69

iTrader: (2)

yea the 287 was in the mid 270s one thing to note aswell is the 03Zs where the lightest 350 to date.

jfrlhobbs

So, if the true HP is 313, why did the SAE make Nissan list it at 306?

RBlover69

iTrader: (2)

its not true hp ratings , those where old SAE standards since then they use difference stats to measure power. True power by todays standards are 306. Just like the revups rating back then was 300hp its been calibrated at 293. Todays standards are alot more presise then old standards.

SniperHunter

iTrader: (9)

350Zs weren't affected by the new SAE standards. They remain 287HP and 300HP - because Z VQs have slightly different exhausts, intakes, and tunes than others - especially the 06, because we have revised airboxes.

And also the 03s aren't the lightest. My 06 Touring weighs 3250lbs. Nearly the same as an 03 Touring. An 07 weighs the same, too. I don't know why Nissan states otherwise. I, as well as a number of 07 owners (Gooey, being one of them), have weighed our cars - we all got the same weights.

SniperHunter

iTrader: (9)

A little history lesson on Nissan rating all of their RWD VQ35s at 287: They basically used the 350Z's specifications and applied it to all of their cars, since, essentially, they are the same motors (this was a loop hole of the old SAE standards). Now, with the new standards, you can't do that anymore. You have to submit individual data for a unique application. So, the G35, FX35, and M35 all had to be re-rated to 275HP - reason being, is for the reasons I listed in my post above.

If you notice, even though the new EX35 has the VQ35HR, it only has 296HP - and not 306. Same engine, but with slight variables that create a lower rating.

07-Zman

I actually mounted 2 live skunks in my intakes. When I hit full throttle an electric shock dispenses high octane skunk fart into my engine. It's worth 22 butt dyno hp.....

RBlover69

iTrader: (2)

i couldve sworn they relisted numbers for the 06 model to 293. Let me check if i can find if i still have that info. damn havent looked at SAE ratings in a minute.

SniperHunter

iTrader: (9)

http://nissannews.com/nissan/2006veh...pe/specs.shtml

Nissan's official press site

You're getting the Z confused with the G35 6MT:

http://nissannews.com/infiniti/2006v...pe/index.shtml

RBlover69

iTrader: (2)

those stats are issues underneath the previous SAE standards though if ya take a look back in that year june.

The revup's 300hp im preety certain where not rated underneath the new ratings. there is clearly more of a pronounced difference for it just to be 6rwhp difference and a tq increase. I dont have the index with me right now at work , but i know for certin that the 300hp revup and the 287de do not output those crank numbers in todays SAE. Nothing wrong with them , but its that technically they shouldnt . lol

SOLO-350Z

iTrader: (26)

The new SAE standard comes into play compared to the older engine. The car makes a lot more hp at 306 compared to the old sae standard with 306 hp.

The car dynos 270~ range stock, the REV-Up did 245-255 range stock.

SOLO-350Z

iTrader: (26)

Not sure what you are trying to say, but the new 07 HR is affected by the new SAE standard rating. By law they have too.

RBlover69

iTrader: (2)

exactly my revup dyno'd 251 compared to my 04 dynoing at 235 compared to my friends HR dynoing at 276


Comparing those numbers its easy to understand that underneath the new SAE standards the revup cannot be a 300hp engine at the crank.

But back then underneath the old standards it def was. Just how back then the HR wouldve probably been a 320hp motor or so lmao.