Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

Official 370Z specs, with links & new pics - the real thing - 11.15.08

Old Nov 17, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #141  
BrianV's Avatar
BrianV
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by skaterbasist
Those who said the GTR was going to be very heavy got flamed.

Those who said the 370Z would have ~330 hp got flamed.

Those who said the 370Z wouldn't be much lighter than the 08's got flamed.

I think a lot of people were just fantasizing what they wanted. Because none of these were a surprise to me or to anyone who were being logical.

Either way, the 370Z is a win. It adds alot more amenities and performance over the 350Z.
Agreed 100%. Even the weights I posted last week people were fighting against yet they're extremely close.

The .29 coefficient of drag is FREAKING AWFUL too.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:04 AM
  #142  
BrianV's Avatar
BrianV
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by 350zJIM
2)corvette= crappy quality, not as reliable, you pay a premium for quality
If Nissan made the same version of the c6 I would rather have a 1 yr old version of that
Fail Jimbo! I'd say that Zs are less reliable than Vettes (just by frequenting the forums, more Zs appear to go back for warranty issues than Vettes do). Even my 07 Infiniti G35s which has a similar interior to the new Z shows it's signs of cost cutting on a regular basis. Granted the Vette's interior isn't world-reknowned for being great, it's better than the 03-08 Z's and probably not that much worse than the new one.

Last edited by BrianV; Nov 17, 2008 at 09:08 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #143  
cupcar's Avatar
cupcar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 195
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by trebien
Track hardware is NOT light. It's actually difficult to take a car, upgrade it to track hardware, and lose weight at the same time. The bigger brakes, wheels, tires, suspension upgrades, etc... usually are heavier.
I added the Track brakes to my Enthusiast Z and carefully weighed the components, the calipers were lighter and the discs were heavier but the total added weight came to only 8.8 pounds.

At the same time I added Nismo 18" forged wheels with wider 245 and 275 tires front and rear and the new wheels and tires were 33 pounds lighter than my original 17 inch cast wheels with narrower tires.

So this combination of parts saved me over 24 pounds...not bad for bigger brakes, wider tires and wheels...I think the Sports Package is on the same trend as this.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 09:38 AM
  #144  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

For most, "track hardware" would also include suspension upgrades such as thicker (heavier) anti-roll bars, stiffer springs and track duty shocks, or coilovers, a true BBK (weigh a 14" Stoptech against stock parts, for instance), etc. For instance, the NISMO is basically a track-prepped enthusiast, and weighs ~50 pounds heavier. You made some nice, selective upgrades that were smart choices for weight considerations.

But the 370Z sport pkg already comes with very lightweight 19" forged wheels.

And aluminum calipers.

So not much to lose, there, with aftermarket parts. Or compared to base components, since the rotors are much larger AND thicker. What size were the track brakes you put on?

Plus, the sport pkg adds VLSD...

And front chin/rear hatch spoilers... which add some weight.

The sport pkg could have a net weight gain of ~40 pounds.

And, yes... the sport spare is aluminum... a nice touch.

I think a sport touring will be right around 3300 pounds, about 80 pounds less than a current 350Z Grand Touring, which has similar equipment levels.

So we've got 80-pound lighter car with more power and better handling... an excellent value for sure, but still a little porky for my tastes. Especially compared to a 300+ pound lighter Cayman S.

Tough choice...
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 10:10 AM
  #145  
sq40's Avatar
sq40
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,587
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Default

No info on the new Nizmo Version?
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #146  
krucialb's Avatar
krucialb
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: new orleans
Default

yea it sucks that this car doesnt weigh 3100lbs and have 350hp/300tq but honestly if you are buying this car for daily driving or to have some fun on the streets will you even notice the difference? i can understand for those who want to use their car for track purposes and such but i highly doubt thats everyone who's complaining. i'm not complaining about 332hp and 3232lbs, its quite fine with me.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #147  
OldDirty Z33's Avatar
OldDirty Z33
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
From: Inland Empire
Default

sick! I want to buy one now
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 10:47 AM
  #148  
Art Vandaleigh's Avatar
Art Vandaleigh
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: NE Ohio
Default

Originally Posted by trebien
So we've got 80-pound lighter car with more power and better handling... an excellent value for sure, but still a little porky for my tastes. Especially compared to a 300+ pound lighter Cayman S.

Tough choice...
A new Cayman S is almost double the price of what the 370Z will go for, so there really is no comparison. Give Nissan engineers another 25-30 grand to work with on the price of the Z and they could surely drop a 100 or so more lbs off, but could porsche do the same with a 35K Cayman, AND give us 332hp? I think not. Buyers who can plunk down 50-60K on a new car are in a totally different buying bracket than the majority of Z owners.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #149  
Scipher21's Avatar
Scipher21
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

weak, and all 370z's aboard the fail boat plz
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:07 AM
  #150  
cupcar's Avatar
cupcar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 195
Likes: 1
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Art Vandaleigh
A new Cayman S is almost double the price of what the 370Z will go for, so there really is no comparison. Give Nissan engineers another 25-30 grand to work with on the price of the Z and they could surely drop a 100 or so more lbs off, but could porsche do the same with a 35K Cayman, AND give us 332hp? I think not. Buyers who can plunk down 50-60K on a new car are in a totally different buying bracket than the majority of Z owners.
+1 here...I am a huge Porsche fan and have a 911 besides my Z. I drove my business partners new Cayman at a Porsche autocross recently. The car is very nice but at $59,100 for the Cayman S to which you must add $1090 for Xenon lights and $550 for automatic climate control all standard on the Z...give me a break.

Porsche makes a huge profit on their cars, in the range of 25-35% according to Forbes magazine, I bet Nissan's margin is much less and their value for the dollar is much better than Porsche IMHO.

Last edited by cupcar; Nov 17, 2008 at 11:09 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:15 AM
  #151  
2004Black350z's Avatar
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
Premier Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,097
Likes: 17
From: NC
Default

Originally Posted by Scipher21
weak, and all 370z's aboard the fail boat plz
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #152  
VandyZ's Avatar
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

FYI, Nissan tried to leave the rear fog from the European market, on for the US version. It came down to the wire, then California did what they always do, and told Nissan they wouldn't allow it (it was too high). Thus we get stuck with the black lens. Not sure if it will be deleted in the future, when they have more time to produce a replacement cover.

IIRC, you can get get this on the Mini Cooper as an option. I really dont see what the big deal is.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:21 AM
  #153  
VandyZ's Avatar
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by BrianV
Fail Jimbo! I'd say that Zs are less reliable than Vettes (just by frequenting the forums, more Zs appear to go back for warranty issues than Vettes do). Even my 07 Infiniti G35s which has a similar interior to the new Z shows it's signs of cost cutting on a regular basis. Granted the Vette's interior isn't world-reknowned for being great, it's better than the 03-08 Z's and probably not that much worse than the new one.
Yeah, I would guess the vette is the most reliable sports car in history. While the interior is not great, its not as horrible as everyone makes it out to be. If anything its rather plain and doesnt set the car apart as much as it should. But it makes the car cheap to own for what it is. They do now offer the 4LT package that leathers out the entire interior, but at a cost of about 10 grand. OUCH!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #154  
Mike@RiversideInfiniti's Avatar
Mike@RiversideInfiniti
Vendor - Former Vendor
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: riverside
Default

As mentioned before, weight distribution isn't as important as moment of inertia.

FYI, the 08+ s2k is now 49/51 weight distribution. In a FR car. wtf.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:39 AM
  #155  
Chebosto's Avatar
Chebosto
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,681
Likes: 11
From: Redondo Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BrianV
Agreed 100%. Even the weights I posted last week people were fighting against yet they're extremely close.

The .29 coefficient of drag is FREAKING AWFUL too.
wat.

come on brian.. u know thats not bad-

well. considering the new accord is 0.26 or something..

0.29 is not bad- remember you also induce drag when trying to reduce rear lift via lip spoiler and under body channels..

that front lip spoiler is def bigger than the 03 track front lip..
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:40 AM
  #156  
trebien's Avatar
trebien
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Default

Originally Posted by Art Vandaleigh
A new Cayman S is almost double the price of what the 370Z will go for, so there really is no comparison. Give Nissan engineers another 25-30 grand to work with on the price of the Z and they could surely drop a 100 or so more lbs off, but could porsche do the same with a 35K Cayman, AND give us 332hp? I think not. Buyers who can plunk down 50-60K on a new car are in a totally different buying bracket than the majority of Z owners.
No question, the Cayman S at MSRP is a rip-off... the reason I didn't buy one. And the 370Z at $35-40K is quite a value, especially now compared to the 350Z.

But I'm looking at 2 year old Cayman S's... around $40K-$45K... so similar price point. The major depreciation hit has already occured... find a certified used example, and it comes with a 100K mile warranty. Thank you, tanked economy.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #157  
asheth007's Avatar
asheth007
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Germany/Iraq for now
Default

This is my first post here I am currently deployed to iraq, and have been looking around here for a while my current ride is 03 Eclipse Gt Spyder looking to upgrade to either 08 350z or 370z. But enough backstory and back on topic I hope this is not a repost for fear of flame lol. But I found these pictures dont know if they have been put up already.






Can be seen here
http://370ztech.com/

Sorry if this is repost of pictures there are alot of threads on this car I searched I am a member of club3g with same user name.

Last edited by asheth007; Nov 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:59 AM
  #158  
jeff91ta's Avatar
jeff91ta
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: somewhere cold
Default

Originally Posted by KS0385
What's the weight distribution gonna do to its handling?
I think we'll here many more stories of people sliding these cars right off the highways when it starts to sprinkle... assuming the thing still rides on bridgestones.

Seeing the 370 specs is disappointing but not surprising; maybe I'll be more impressed when some track times start coming out.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #159  
ladyzed's Avatar
ladyzed
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 573
Likes: 1
From: Kamloops BC
Default

Originally Posted by Kwame@z1
OMG! You win the award for the biggest lurker of ALL TIME!

ZoinK!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #160  
Mike@RiversideInfiniti's Avatar
Mike@RiversideInfiniti
Vendor - Former Vendor
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: riverside
Default

Originally Posted by Chebosto
wat.

come on brian.. u know thats not bad-

well. considering the new accord is 0.26 or something..

0.29 is not bad- remember you also induce drag when trying to reduce rear lift via lip spoiler and under body channels..

that front lip spoiler is def bigger than the 03 track front lip..

The Veyron's Cd is 0.41 'normally'. With top speed mode enabled, it is 0.36.

I think .29 is rather spectactular, especially when you consider the swept area. The Camry's total drag is still greater than that of the Z.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:26 AM.