Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

ST/SU Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2016, 05:23 PM
  #261  
90nissanS13
New Member
 
90nissanS13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 551
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dblock55


I know it's not much but finally broke ground on the cage. First 2 bends on the main hoop.
The ice has broken.
Old 04-07-2016, 05:18 AM
  #262  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 90nissanS13
The ice has broken.
^^^ I hope no pun intended because its F$*%KING SNOWING HERE!!!!! GODDAMN WINTER JUST WONT LET GO!!! Even in spring lol
Old 04-07-2016, 01:04 PM
  #263  
90nissanS13
New Member
 
90nissanS13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 551
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

AHAHA, no pun intended!

Although, it is warm and sunny here today. Apparently, it's a good day to take out the brand new 488 gtb
Old 04-07-2016, 04:53 PM
  #264  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Got the cage in for some fitting, it was designed to be further back so it still needs to be cut...fits pretty well where it is not sure if I should keep it or move it... thoughts? The picture is where it sits now, was originally going to put it by the fuel pump housing. Like in the attached photo.






Old 04-07-2016, 06:04 PM
  #265  
90nissanS13
New Member
 
90nissanS13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 551
Received 49 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Nice LED...

Put it up on the bulkhead, further back. You don't want the main-hoop on the floor if you have other options.
The following users liked this post:
Dblock55 (04-08-2016)
Old 04-07-2016, 11:56 PM
  #266  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

^ this, the mid chassis crossbeam is a stronger point to mount to.
The following 2 users liked this post by armt350z:
90nissanS13 (04-08-2016), Dblock55 (04-08-2016)
Old 04-08-2016, 09:44 AM
  #267  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 90nissanS13
Nice LED...

Put it up on the bulkhead, further back. You don't want the main-hoop on the floor if you have other options.


Haha that LED light did have a plastic cover around it for about 2 seconds... been working for 3 years without it though, cant complain.

Was thinking bulkhead would be stronger, thanks for the confirmation. The only reason I was thinking of mounting it to the floor is for the door bracing... could the lower portion of the x will have to start pretty high if the hoop is mounted to the bulkhead.
Old 04-08-2016, 11:28 AM
  #268  
Blurvision
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Blurvision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Tuxedo, NY
Posts: 659
Received 102 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Looking good, another vote for on the strong center cross beam. Added benefit is tons of room for seats.
Old 04-08-2016, 12:04 PM
  #269  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Why do X at all? Maybe do a nascar door bar style
Old 04-08-2016, 12:14 PM
  #270  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

X-brace adds more rigidity
Old 04-08-2016, 12:25 PM
  #271  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I'm not sure on that, got any data to support that statement?
Old 04-08-2016, 01:48 PM
  #272  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default




Up on the bulkhead.
Old 04-08-2016, 02:04 PM
  #273  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by armt350z
I'm not sure on that, got any data to support that statement?
Shame on me.... i dont. My boss always says, an engineer without data is just another guy with an opinion. Without CADing it up I really cant confirm this theory, but I may just do it just to test the theory. Im going off of the general principal of bracing a flexing member. If you think of a cantilever beam, the higher the angle of the support the stronger the support. Obviously a chassis is way more complex than a cantilever beam loaded from a single point but for the sake of arguement, if you flex the front of the chassis relative to the rear the x brace will resist the flex, a tube that is in the same plane as the load will help a bit as the top bar will be placed in compression and the bottom in tension (or vice versa depending on the direction of the load), but since its parallel to the reference plane it wont be as effective as the x. Dunno if this is comprehensible lol.
Old 04-08-2016, 11:58 PM
  #274  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Ahhh, Ok your referring specifically to chassis rigidity. I could see that, I was thinking you were talking about to rigidity of the bars in a side impact crash sequence. You could create a Nascar door bad that is compression loaded and improve upon the neutral loaded X bar. But it would require additional bars going from the main hoop to the back and front. Some of the Nascar bars that also connect into the door frame would probably be more stiff, but almost unanimously forbidden by most all sanctioning bodies.

I would run a Nascar bar on mine if I could, but FIA only allows X sadly.

Here is a 2012 cup car chassis, the door bars are loaded in compression and would likely resist any torquing of the chassis. Also any side impact would try to push the main hoop rearward, which is supported by the further bracing at the node.

Old 04-09-2016, 06:10 AM
  #275  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by armt350z
Ahhh, Ok your referring specifically to chassis rigidity. I could see that, I was thinking you were talking about to rigidity of the bars in a side impact crash sequence. You could create a Nascar door bad that is compression loaded and improve upon the neutral loaded X bar. But it would require additional bars going from the main hoop to the back and front. Some of the Nascar bars that also connect into the door frame would probably be more stiff, but almost unanimously forbidden by most all sanctioning bodies.

I would run a Nascar bar on mine if I could, but FIA only allows X sadly.

Here is a 2012 cup car chassis, the door bars are loaded in compression and would likely resist any torquing of the chassis. Also any side impact would try to push the main hoop rearward, which is supported by ....
Very good point. I may go with x bar on passenger side and nascar on drivers side... safety is the overwriting priority. Thanks for the picture, good image to study.
Old 04-09-2016, 04:41 PM
  #276  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default



Small update... cant believe how much time notching takes up
Old 04-10-2016, 01:59 AM
  #277  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

I ended up picking a harbor freight tubing notcher, with the 20% off coupon I had it cost all of $35 shipped. It is definitely a cheap tool but with some mild modification it worked well for what I was doing with it and saved me a ton of time.
Old 04-10-2016, 04:46 AM
  #278  
Dblock55
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Dblock55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The mitten state
Posts: 684
Received 32 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

What type of modification? Did you use it in a drill press of just a cordless drill?
Old 04-10-2016, 07:55 AM
  #279  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

It was a regular plug in type drill. I had to add a 1/8" shim the bracket that holds the tube so it was perfectly centered to the drill bit. Also buy some quality hole saw bits like a lenox and dont forget to lube up the shaft, since its using brass bushings instead of bearings like a high quality unit would have.
Old 04-10-2016, 10:36 AM
  #280  
armt350z
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
armt350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 684
Received 74 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Here is the notcher I use, I also just saw a 20% off coupon code for a single item from harbor freight in my email. Coupon code says its for today only.

Notcher : http://www.harborfreight.com/pipe-tu...her-42324.html

Coupon code : 56391896
The following users liked this post:
Dblock55 (04-10-2016)


Quick Reply: ST/SU Build



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:27 PM.