VQ Oil Analysis and Info
#521
Originally Posted by coachk
Yes, I was referring to a minimum-maximum HTHS..In your sticky you said that a higher HTHS score is recommended for FI/Built/Drag
Of course, nissan recommends a 40 weight as the heaviest grade to use, so I don't recommend anything higher than that, but it's your engine. And if it's built, then Nissan's recommendations might not be very applicable to you.
Be that as it may, I highly doubt that you are doing anything with your car which requires an extreme HTHS score be priority over the other factors to consider when choosing an oil.
If you track your car, are FI, etc... then find some oils with good UOA results from similar engines and go from there. The HTHS score is useful for you as a consideration that would not normally be a factor for most daily driven stock engines (unless they were really concerned about fuel economy). So, if you find two oils that have good UOA results for FI engines similar to yours, then the HTHS is a good way to split the difference between which to use, but not the primary factor for you to choose an oil.
As an example, PP 10W-30 and GC 0W-30 are both very good oils with lots of excellent UOA results. For the daily driven VQ with stock block, it wouldn't make a real difference which one people wanted to use. Whichever they find cheaper or personally like more would be the deciding factor between the two. However, if the person tracked their car a lot, or had FI on their engine, then the higher HTHS of the GC 0W-30 is worth considering and makes it the better oil to use between the two. It's a thicker oil, so it has a higher HTHS score, and will prabably hold up to the high temps and high stress of track use and turbo center bearings better than the PP 10W-30 would. So, HTHS is important for the FI crowd to consider, with higher numbers being in your favor, but only between reputable oils with good wear results- not as an independent factor.
Will
#522
Banned
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic in your first paragraph about using a 60 or 70 weight because it has higher HTHS #'s.
I have a built motor w/ TT and N20 and will be drag racing alot towards the end of the year so I was just trying to figure out which oil will work best.
I will go with Quadcams recommendation and use the Rotella unless you have a better recommendation. My car is not a daily driver
I have a built motor w/ TT and N20 and will be drag racing alot towards the end of the year so I was just trying to figure out which oil will work best.
I will go with Quadcams recommendation and use the Rotella unless you have a better recommendation. My car is not a daily driver
#523
Originally Posted by coachk
I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic in your first paragraph about using a 60 or 70 weight because it has higher HTHS #'s. I have a built motor w/ TT and N20 and will be drag racing alot towards the end of the year so I was just trying to figure out which oil will work best.
Originally Posted by coachk
I will go with Quadcams recommendation and use the Rotella unless you have a better recommendation.
Will
#524
I have my results back form Blackstone using the Rotella T-Syn 5W-40.
The oil was in the car for just over a year, and for 6k miles. No track days o this sample. I drove it hard, and it sat for long periods of time in-between. I drove for a good mix of city and highway driving, with lots of short trips of less than 5 minutes.
The oil looks good. It's in grade, low wear, and a good TBN. I could have kept this oil in longer for sure, but I was eager to try something else.
I burned through 3/4 quart with this oil by the time I changed it. I also could tell it was a thicker weight oil than usual. The engine did not seem to rev as quick unless the oil was good and hot first, compared to the 30 weights I've used and even the M1 0W-40. The best thing I noticed about this oil was the lack of any timing chain rattle. The normal start-up rattle was drastically reduced with the T-Syn versus the last round of M1 I had in there. Good old ZDDP I would imagine is the reason.
I also have updated the comparison charts with all of the new and current blends that have been tested, and made a few new Q&A posts to update the first page, but it seems I'm not allowed to edit my posts now. So, I'll PM a mod and see what's up.
Will
The oil was in the car for just over a year, and for 6k miles. No track days o this sample. I drove it hard, and it sat for long periods of time in-between. I drove for a good mix of city and highway driving, with lots of short trips of less than 5 minutes.
The oil looks good. It's in grade, low wear, and a good TBN. I could have kept this oil in longer for sure, but I was eager to try something else.
I burned through 3/4 quart with this oil by the time I changed it. I also could tell it was a thicker weight oil than usual. The engine did not seem to rev as quick unless the oil was good and hot first, compared to the 30 weights I've used and even the M1 0W-40. The best thing I noticed about this oil was the lack of any timing chain rattle. The normal start-up rattle was drastically reduced with the T-Syn versus the last round of M1 I had in there. Good old ZDDP I would imagine is the reason.
I also have updated the comparison charts with all of the new and current blends that have been tested, and made a few new Q&A posts to update the first page, but it seems I'm not allowed to edit my posts now. So, I'll PM a mod and see what's up.
Will
Last edited by Resolute; 06-25-2008 at 05:14 PM.
#525
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado, Denver Metro
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looks really good. FWIW the HTHS number floating around BITOG is 3.9.
Interestingly my Spped6 revs quicker on the Rotella Syn versus GC. Still have GC in the Alti SE-R and will run it 7 before taking it out.
Interestingly my Spped6 revs quicker on the Rotella Syn versus GC. Still have GC in the Alti SE-R and will run it 7 before taking it out.
#526
The RTS only seemed "sluggish" when it wasn't up to full temp. After really working the engine and getting it good and hot, and the oil psi down, then it felt the same as any other engine oil I've used.
Viscosity calculators are never right-on. Not even close in most cases. I would have guessed the actual number for RTS to be 4.2 HTHS, though. Just based on the fact that the calculator I used is usually 3-4 points higher than what the actual reported HTHS is. But who knows. Maybe someone will call SOPUS and just ask.
I'm using PP 5W-30 now. Will go for a normal 3k miles and change it.
I've PM'd Nitrouz about updating the UOA comparison charts, we'll see what can be done. Sucks to let this thread go to waste because of he new edit rules.
Will
Viscosity calculators are never right-on. Not even close in most cases. I would have guessed the actual number for RTS to be 4.2 HTHS, though. Just based on the fact that the calculator I used is usually 3-4 points higher than what the actual reported HTHS is. But who knows. Maybe someone will call SOPUS and just ask.
I'm using PP 5W-30 now. Will go for a normal 3k miles and change it.
I've PM'd Nitrouz about updating the UOA comparison charts, we'll see what can be done. Sucks to let this thread go to waste because of he new edit rules.
Will
#527
****First Page Updated- New Comparison Charts and Questions Added****
The new comparison charts are now up, courtesy of Dave079. They ahve the old formulas o some oils removed, and the new formulas up. Some will notice the RP samples look better than they used to. RP has a new formula of 5W-30, and the old UOA's of RP were thrown out and the new one posted. Eneos and Rotella T-Syn have also been added, and the M1 formulas used have been updated.
Also, two new questions have been posetd about oil filter selection and drain interval.
Will
edit: also, the comparison charts now show the number of oil samples for each average result
The new comparison charts are now up, courtesy of Dave079. They ahve the old formulas o some oils removed, and the new formulas up. Some will notice the RP samples look better than they used to. RP has a new formula of 5W-30, and the old UOA's of RP were thrown out and the new one posted. Eneos and Rotella T-Syn have also been added, and the M1 formulas used have been updated.
Also, two new questions have been posetd about oil filter selection and drain interval.
Will
edit: also, the comparison charts now show the number of oil samples for each average result
Last edited by Resolute; 06-26-2008 at 03:34 PM.
#528
New Member
iTrader: (18)
CoachK, Resolute,
I am considering Mobile 1 15W-50 for the summer for my built engine+TT. Here is the product data sheet. I will perform a UOA this fall when I change to a lighter weight oil, perhaps 0W-40. One of the considerations for me is that the heavier weight oils tend not to leak from turbo seals so a 50 weight oil is what I am looking for. I was running Motul 300V 15W-50 but after seeing some of the results here, I was going to change (I left a oil cooler clamp loose and my 300V went all over the garage floor in the 5 seconds it took me to realize it - not sure I can do a UOA with 500 miles only?).
Here is the product specs for the Mobile 1 15W-50 (this is the silver cap version, not the extended performance gold cap, which I have read is suboptimal):
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
Typical Properties
Mobil 1 15W-50
SAE Grade 15W-50
Viscosity, ASTM D 445
cSt @ 40º C 131.2
cSt @ 100º C 18.1
Viscosity Index, ASTM D 2270 154
Sulfated Ash, wt%, ASTM D 874 1.21
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC ASTM D 4683 4.50
Pour Point, ºC, ASTM D 97 -39
Flash Point, ºC, ASTM D 92 235
Density @15º C kg/l, ASTM D 4052 0.87
I am considering Mobile 1 15W-50 for the summer for my built engine+TT. Here is the product data sheet. I will perform a UOA this fall when I change to a lighter weight oil, perhaps 0W-40. One of the considerations for me is that the heavier weight oils tend not to leak from turbo seals so a 50 weight oil is what I am looking for. I was running Motul 300V 15W-50 but after seeing some of the results here, I was going to change (I left a oil cooler clamp loose and my 300V went all over the garage floor in the 5 seconds it took me to realize it - not sure I can do a UOA with 500 miles only?).
Here is the product specs for the Mobile 1 15W-50 (this is the silver cap version, not the extended performance gold cap, which I have read is suboptimal):
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
Typical Properties
Mobil 1 15W-50
SAE Grade 15W-50
Viscosity, ASTM D 445
cSt @ 40º C 131.2
cSt @ 100º C 18.1
Viscosity Index, ASTM D 2270 154
Sulfated Ash, wt%, ASTM D 874 1.21
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC ASTM D 4683 4.50
Pour Point, ºC, ASTM D 97 -39
Flash Point, ºC, ASTM D 92 235
Density @15º C kg/l, ASTM D 4052 0.87
Last edited by rcdash; 07-03-2008 at 06:15 AM.
#529
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado, Denver Metro
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rcdash
CoachK, Resolute,
I am considering Mobile 1 15W-50 for the summer for my built engine+TT. Here is the product data sheet. I will perform a UOA this fall when I change to a lighter weight oil, perhaps 0W-40. One of the considerations for me is that the heavier weight oils tend not to leak from turbo seals so a 50 weight oil is what I am looking for. I was running Motul 300V 15W-50 but after seeing some of the results here, I was going to change (I left a oil cooler clamp loose and my 300V went all over the garage floor in the 5 seconds it took me to realize it - not sure I can do a UOA with 500 miles only?).
Here is the product specs for the Mobile 1 15W-50 (this is the silver cap version, not the extended performance gold cap, which I have read is suboptimal):
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
Typical Properties
Mobil 1 15W-50
SAE Grade 15W-50
Viscosity, ASTM D 445
cSt @ 40º C 131.2
cSt @ 100º C 18.1
Viscosity Index, ASTM D 2270 154
Sulfated Ash, wt%, ASTM D 874 1.21
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC ASTM D 4683 4.50
Pour Point, ºC, ASTM D 97 -39
Flash Point, ºC, ASTM D 92 235
Density @15º C kg/l, ASTM D 4052 0.87
I am considering Mobile 1 15W-50 for the summer for my built engine+TT. Here is the product data sheet. I will perform a UOA this fall when I change to a lighter weight oil, perhaps 0W-40. One of the considerations for me is that the heavier weight oils tend not to leak from turbo seals so a 50 weight oil is what I am looking for. I was running Motul 300V 15W-50 but after seeing some of the results here, I was going to change (I left a oil cooler clamp loose and my 300V went all over the garage floor in the 5 seconds it took me to realize it - not sure I can do a UOA with 500 miles only?).
Here is the product specs for the Mobile 1 15W-50 (this is the silver cap version, not the extended performance gold cap, which I have read is suboptimal):
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
Typical Properties
Mobil 1 15W-50
SAE Grade 15W-50
Viscosity, ASTM D 445
cSt @ 40º C 131.2
cSt @ 100º C 18.1
Viscosity Index, ASTM D 2270 154
Sulfated Ash, wt%, ASTM D 874 1.21
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC ASTM D 4683 4.50
Pour Point, ºC, ASTM D 97 -39
Flash Point, ºC, ASTM D 92 235
Density @15º C kg/l, ASTM D 4052 0.87
#531
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Originally Posted by rcdash
CoachK, Resolute,
I am considering Mobile 1 15W-50 for the summer for my built engine+TT. Here is the product data sheet. I will perform a UOA this fall when I change to a lighter weight oil, perhaps 0W-40. One of the considerations for me is that the heavier weight oils tend not to leak from turbo seals so a 50 weight oil is what I am looking for. I was running Motul 300V 15W-50 but after seeing some of the results here, I was going to change
I am considering Mobile 1 15W-50 for the summer for my built engine+TT. Here is the product data sheet. I will perform a UOA this fall when I change to a lighter weight oil, perhaps 0W-40. One of the considerations for me is that the heavier weight oils tend not to leak from turbo seals so a 50 weight oil is what I am looking for. I was running Motul 300V 15W-50 but after seeing some of the results here, I was going to change
here's the info on the M1 TDT oil:
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...ruck_5W-40.asp
#534
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Resolute
I have my results back form Blackstone using the Rotella T-Syn 5W-40.
The oil was in the car for just over a year, and for 6k miles. No track days o this sample. I drove it hard, and it sat for long periods of time in-between. I drove for a good mix of city and highway driving, with lots of short trips of less than 5 minutes.
The oil looks good. It's in grade, low wear, and a good TBN. I could have kept this oil in longer for sure, but I was eager to try something else.
I burned through 3/4 quart with this oil by the time I changed it. I also could tell it was a thicker weight oil than usual. The engine did not seem to rev as quick unless the oil was good and hot first, compared to the 30 weights I've used and even the M1 0W-40. The best thing I noticed about this oil was the lack of any timing chain rattle. The normal start-up rattle was drastically reduced with the T-Syn versus the last round of M1 I had in there. Good old ZDDP I would imagine is the reason...
Will
The oil was in the car for just over a year, and for 6k miles. No track days o this sample. I drove it hard, and it sat for long periods of time in-between. I drove for a good mix of city and highway driving, with lots of short trips of less than 5 minutes.
The oil looks good. It's in grade, low wear, and a good TBN. I could have kept this oil in longer for sure, but I was eager to try something else.
I burned through 3/4 quart with this oil by the time I changed it. I also could tell it was a thicker weight oil than usual. The engine did not seem to rev as quick unless the oil was good and hot first, compared to the 30 weights I've used and even the M1 0W-40. The best thing I noticed about this oil was the lack of any timing chain rattle. The normal start-up rattle was drastically reduced with the T-Syn versus the last round of M1 I had in there. Good old ZDDP I would imagine is the reason...
Will
I used M1 10W-40 in my smaller motors (SR20DE, KA24DE) and I did get timing chain noise on start-up and a little upper end noise until warm. I switched to a 5W-30 and it went away. For simplicity I run the same oil in all 3 all four seasons, and with 137k miles on the SR20DE, 128k miles on the KA24DE, neither burns measurable amounts between changes. My driving is similar to your desc but add AutoX and occasional track days, and none of the cars sit for any significant length of time.
In most simple terms, why are you a fan of Rotella T-Syn 5W-40 when you have to add 3/4 QT between changes and in your own terms, "The engine did not seem to rev as quick unless the oil was good and hot first"? Half the year my engine takes a good long time to get "good and hot", I couldn't put up with that.
My scan of 20+ pages seems to indicate you're not so much a of M1 fan. If so, why? The UOA's look pretty good for 5W-30 M1, although you've probably already pointed out somewhere that a sample size in the single digits (<5-10 samples max) is invalid statistically w/re to being transferable to anyone else.
Great info, sparks my interest in obtaining a UOA for my VQ, as you may have guessed, I tend to hold onto my Nissans for awhile
#535
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
The Zddp additive package in Rotella is great for solid lifter engines. MOst engine builders of domestic engines usign a flat tappet cam/lifter recommend oils with ZDDP. there is alot more friction on a flat tappet/ bucket compared to a roller lifter / cam follower...that's where the zddp additive really helps.
#536
Originally Posted by rcdash
CoachK, Resolute,
I am considering Mobile 1 15W-50 for the summer for my built engine+TT. Here is the product data sheet. I will perform a UOA this fall when I change to a lighter weight oil, perhaps 0W-40. One of the considerations for me is that the heavier weight oils tend not to leak from turbo seals so a 50 weight oil is what I am looking for. I was running Motul 300V 15W-50 but after seeing some of the results here, I was going to change (I left a oil cooler clamp loose and my 300V went all over the garage floor in the 5 seconds it took me to realize it - not sure I can do a UOA with 500 miles only?).
Here is the product specs for the Mobile 1 15W-50 (this is the silver cap version, not the extended performance gold cap, which I have read is suboptimal):
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
Typical Properties
Mobil 1 15W-50
SAE Grade 15W-50
Viscosity, ASTM D 445
cSt @ 40º C 131.2
cSt @ 100º C 18.1
Viscosity Index, ASTM D 2270 154
Sulfated Ash, wt%, ASTM D 874 1.21
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC ASTM D 4683 4.50
Pour Point, ºC, ASTM D 97 -39
Flash Point, ºC, ASTM D 92 235
Density @15º C kg/l, ASTM D 4052 0.87
I am considering Mobile 1 15W-50 for the summer for my built engine+TT. Here is the product data sheet. I will perform a UOA this fall when I change to a lighter weight oil, perhaps 0W-40. One of the considerations for me is that the heavier weight oils tend not to leak from turbo seals so a 50 weight oil is what I am looking for. I was running Motul 300V 15W-50 but after seeing some of the results here, I was going to change (I left a oil cooler clamp loose and my 300V went all over the garage floor in the 5 seconds it took me to realize it - not sure I can do a UOA with 500 miles only?).
Here is the product specs for the Mobile 1 15W-50 (this is the silver cap version, not the extended performance gold cap, which I have read is suboptimal):
http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/Lub...il1_15W-50.asp
Typical Properties
Mobil 1 15W-50
SAE Grade 15W-50
Viscosity, ASTM D 445
cSt @ 40º C 131.2
cSt @ 100º C 18.1
Viscosity Index, ASTM D 2270 154
Sulfated Ash, wt%, ASTM D 874 1.21
HTHS Viscosity, mPa•s @ 150ºC ASTM D 4683 4.50
Pour Point, ºC, ASTM D 97 -39
Flash Point, ºC, ASTM D 92 235
Density @15º C kg/l, ASTM D 4052 0.87
The specs of this oil simply show it's a 50 weight oil and has a HTHS score in line with a 50 weight oil. The flash point, ash, and pour point all look good, and the MSDS shows the CAS number of a primarily PAO base stock oil, and judging by the aniline point and VI, it's pretty easy to see which SpectraSyn they're using.
It's a well formulated oil with a good name and good history of use behind it, and I wouldn't worry about using it for your application. I couldn't tell you if it's going to be better or worse than another 50 weight oil for your needs, though. A UOA comparison from your engine would be helpful for that.
I will say that QuadCam's recommendation of the M1 TDT 5W-40 is a good call, and that I would try it before using the 15W-50 just because the grade is more suited to what Nissan intended.
Will
#537
Originally Posted by redline350ZZ
Is Mobil 1 15W-50 not a proper step up from Mobil 1 0W-40 for a built motor?
Will
#538
Originally Posted by SteveZ
I've not done a UOA, but have been using M1 5W-30 for 4 years and 48k miles, never have to add any oil between ~4-5k mile changes, don't have start-up "rattle", and it flows particularly well in the severe Winter temps I see here. There are cold dry days where the temps range -5 to 10 F esp in January and the car starts smoothly, no timing chain noise.
I used M1 10W-40 in my smaller motors (SR20DE, KA24DE) and I did get timing chain noise on start-up and a little upper end noise until warm. I switched to a 5W-30 and it went away. For simplicity I run the same oil in all 3 all four seasons, and with 137k miles on the SR20DE, 128k miles on the KA24DE, neither burns measurable amounts between changes. My driving is similar to your desc but add AutoX and occasional track days, and none of the cars sit for any significant length of time.
I used M1 10W-40 in my smaller motors (SR20DE, KA24DE) and I did get timing chain noise on start-up and a little upper end noise until warm. I switched to a 5W-30 and it went away. For simplicity I run the same oil in all 3 all four seasons, and with 137k miles on the SR20DE, 128k miles on the KA24DE, neither burns measurable amounts between changes. My driving is similar to your desc but add AutoX and occasional track days, and none of the cars sit for any significant length of time.
Originally Posted by SteveZ
In most simple terms, why are you a fan of Rotella T-Syn 5W-40 when you have to add 3/4 QT between changes and in your own terms, "The engine did not seem to rev as quick unless the oil was good and hot first"? Half the year my engine takes a good long time to get "good and hot", I couldn't put up with that.
Originally Posted by SteveZ
My scan of 20+ pages seems to indicate you're not so much a of M1 fan. If so, why? The UOA's look pretty good for 5W-30 M1, although you've probably already pointed out somewhere that a sample size in the single digits (<5-10 samples max) is invalid statistically w/re to being transferable to anyone else.
Originally Posted by SteveZ
Great info, sparks my interest in obtaining a UOA for my VQ, as you may have guessed, I tend to hold onto my Nissans for awhile
Will
#539
Originally Posted by QuadCam
The Zddp additive package in Rotella is great for solid lifter engines. MOst engine builders of domestic engines usign a flat tappet cam/lifter recommend oils with ZDDP. there is alot more friction on a flat tappet/ bucket compared to a roller lifter / cam follower...that's where the zddp additive really helps.
Will
#540
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 1,604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2nd UOA on freshly built 06 RevUp
Will,
Here is the 2nd UOA on the freshly built 06 RevUp. Your commentaries on the first one were very much appreciated.
Here is the link to the first UOA. https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...&postcount=427
Data from both UOA’s are combined on this data sheet. Both were using Castrol GTX 5w-30.
Some background data:
2006 MT RevUp VQ35 replaced with freshly built engine.
Total miles on new engine: 7603 mi
Oil change interval: 3223
Oil: Castrol GTX 5w-30
Oil Filter: Nissan OEM
Air Filter: Cotton oil based K&N style. The air filter was replaced at 1259 miles into this OCI with Amsoil’s PAPER EaA type filter. The intake system is a Nismo CAI.
Fuel: Shell V-Power 91 octane
Oil added: Zero
Oil consumption: 4-5 mm (1/8 - < 1/4)
Mods:
Nismo catback exhaust
Nismo CAI
Driving habits: Daily driving, no track or autoX., 40/ 60 freeway/street, no revs over 4000 rpm.
Location geography: Northern California average temperatures 35-100 degrees. Dry, not very dusty.
On this oil change I swapped out the Castrol GTX for Pennzoil Platinum 5w-30 and installed Amsoil oil filter.
Thanks in advance
Curtis
Here is the 2nd UOA on the freshly built 06 RevUp. Your commentaries on the first one were very much appreciated.
Here is the link to the first UOA. https://my350z.com/forum/showpost.ph...&postcount=427
Data from both UOA’s are combined on this data sheet. Both were using Castrol GTX 5w-30.
Some background data:
2006 MT RevUp VQ35 replaced with freshly built engine.
Total miles on new engine: 7603 mi
Oil change interval: 3223
Oil: Castrol GTX 5w-30
Oil Filter: Nissan OEM
Air Filter: Cotton oil based K&N style. The air filter was replaced at 1259 miles into this OCI with Amsoil’s PAPER EaA type filter. The intake system is a Nismo CAI.
Fuel: Shell V-Power 91 octane
Oil added: Zero
Oil consumption: 4-5 mm (1/8 - < 1/4)
Mods:
Nismo catback exhaust
Nismo CAI
Driving habits: Daily driving, no track or autoX., 40/ 60 freeway/street, no revs over 4000 rpm.
Location geography: Northern California average temperatures 35-100 degrees. Dry, not very dusty.
On this oil change I swapped out the Castrol GTX for Pennzoil Platinum 5w-30 and installed Amsoil oil filter.
Thanks in advance
Curtis