Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

brake boosting a TT 350z.

Old Jan 7, 2007 | 04:36 AM
  #61  
MR RIZK's Avatar
MR RIZK
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,225
Likes: 1
From: Australia
Default

Bringing it back from the dead.. Any updates
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 06:11 AM
  #62  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

Since this thread was active I got married, went to the Bahamas for my honeymoon, celebrated Christmas and New Years! December was a super busy month for me.

The module is still waiting to be tested. I have someone interested in testing it, I just need to arrange with them to get it tested.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #63  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by KPierson
Since this thread was active I got married, went to the Bahamas for my honeymoon, celebrated Christmas and New Years! December was a super busy month for me.

The module is still waiting to be tested. I have someone interested in testing it, I just need to arrange with them to get it tested.
Congrats!

Hey, if you need a backup tester, Im willing.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 10:51 PM
  #64  
CodeRed30's Avatar
CodeRed30
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Default

I'm interested. My only thing is for base models that have no VDC will there be a different switch needed or something?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #65  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by doug
of course you couldn't brake boost when you were N/A .. you can't build boost with no form of Forced Induction to begin with.
no need to brake boost if there's "no lag"
you'd already be instantly spooled up the instant you put your foot down at any rpm if there was truely no lag


...sorry I know, back from the dead.
Was reading the viper vs supra thread in the street racing section where the supra was brake boosting and remembered how lots of people believe the Z has no lag whatsoever with turbos

Last edited by sentry65; Jan 21, 2007 at 11:03 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 04:17 AM
  #66  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
no need to brake boost if there's "no lag"
you'd already be instantly spooled up the instant you put your foot down at any rpm if there was truely no lag
Taking .2 seconds to reach full boost isnt what I would consider lag. Starting a race in boost/creating boost before you start the race is just that much nastier, so yes, there is a need to brake boost. You saying there isnt is like saying "why do you need a 2 step off the line...."
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 05:42 AM
  #67  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
no need to brake boost if there's "no lag"
you'd already be instantly spooled up the instant you put your foot down at any rpm if there was truely no lag


...sorry I know, back from the dead.
Was reading the viper vs supra thread in the street racing section where the supra was brake boosting and remembered how lots of people believe the Z has no lag whatsoever with turbos
again.. i made the same post about 50 times.. all 50 times you didn't read what i wrote..

i said... "the myth that SC's have less a Turbo is what it is.. a myth"

never once did i say turbo's have no lag... why the hell would i say that..
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 07:30 AM
  #68  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
Taking .2 seconds to reach full boost isnt what I would consider lag. Starting a race in boost/creating boost before you start the race is just that much nastier, so yes, there is a need to brake boost. You saying there isnt is like saying "why do you need a 2 step off the line...."
I 100% agree with you, .2 seconds isn't much lag at all but it contradicts what doug is saying that it's a myth that .2 seconds of lag is a shorter a amount of time than 0 seconds of lag


doug, I know you said that 50 times. I said 50 times you don't understand the meaning of the word lag

you're confusing lag with the amount of boost, which are different things

to make my point, you can take a SC car and stab at the throttle full on then full off real quick 10 times in a couple seconds and get instant reactive boost every time as fast as you can move your feet. If you try it with a turbo car, the turbos are going to try to spool, but probably not spool into positive amounts of boost. If they do, it's going to be a weird sensation of the car feeling drunk not really getting into boost when you stab the throttle.

And it's not going to be consistent between different rpms. If you wanted to use a high rpm example where the turbo is more responsive to quick stabs of the throttle, then it could be said at high rpms on a SC you're getting around 90-95% full boost instantly reactive to quick throttle stabs

Last edited by sentry65; Jan 22, 2007 at 08:18 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 02:32 PM
  #69  
tig488's Avatar
tig488
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 0
From: bama
Default

i have had the vortech and the aps single, boost is WAY more responsive with the aps vs the vortech. i have over a 100 more ftlb of tq than with the vortech at like 3000 rpms. its a completely different feel.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #70  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

I wasn't talking about the amount of power actually being made at 3000 rpms or anywhere in the powerband, just how quick the FI kit reacts or is in sync with on/off throttle
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 03:42 PM
  #71  
tig488's Avatar
tig488
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,660
Likes: 0
From: bama
Default

yeah i know. still, comparing the vortech vs the single, like you said, rpms and gear selection are major factors, in a high gear with low rpms, the turbo is very slow to respond, whereas the sc reacts better, but in a low gear, at just about any rpm, the turbo wins everytime. i know you arent talking about numbers, but compare power curves, that directly relates to boost response.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 04:17 PM
  #72  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

I know the turbo will win as far as a power curve and boost being made, but I've been refering to the time it takes from hitting the gas to when the turbo spools up (.2 seconds) vs instant positive boost numbers coming from a SC
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 04:24 PM
  #73  
booger's Avatar
booger
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 10,500
Likes: 2
From: council bluffs Ia.
Default

The only problem with that Sentry is that you...we...may be getting 1 maybe 2 psi at 3000rpm and 2 -3 psi at 3500rpm and the TT has just went from 0 to 6-7-8-9psi from 3000 to 3800rpms . Our quicker onset of boost never really gives us any advantage at all .
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #74  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

I know, I'm not saying we have an advantage with boost at low rpms compared to turbos

Just saying there's no lag in response from our FI kit to start making whatever boost that's available at that rpm

Doug's whole theory that "SC's have less lag than turbos is a myth" is crap. I can cite a million sources and books that say otherwise. I WILL say though that with the 350Z's turbos, that statement is more true than say a supra. But the statement itself is not true

SC's have no need to brake boost, the response is instant. But at low rpms they're not going to produce as much boost as a turbo which is a disadvantage.

Last edited by sentry65; Jan 22, 2007 at 05:32 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 05:54 PM
  #75  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Enough of this Turbo vs SC talk. We've heard it all 1000x.

What's up with this brake boosting module that KP was talking about?
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #76  
Dirty Dave's Avatar
Dirty Dave
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: B - low
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
Enough of this Turbo vs SC talk. We've heard it all 1000x.

What's up with this brake boosting module that KP was talking about?
Werd ! Has anyone tried disconnecting that pin to see if it works ?
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 04:05 AM
  #77  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
SC's have no need to brake boost, the response is instant. But at low rpms they're not going to produce as much boost as a turbo which is a disadvantage.

well your instant response doesn't really mean **** when at 3 PSI less than you i am making more power at ever RPM except after 6000
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2007 | 07:07 AM
  #78  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

it does when you're cornering at the limit at part throttle and you can't afford to have more boost than you expected come on after a .2 second delay. Can possibly go off track
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 12:46 AM
  #79  
in2therain3's Avatar
in2therain3
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default

Up from the dead.
Any solutions/updates?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 02:16 AM
  #80  
KPierson's Avatar
KPierson
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
From: Dayton, OH
Default

I've got the 'test' module sitting on my bench still. It's never been installed or tested in a car.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 PM.