Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

vortech FAQ: read this before asking vortech questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 04:49 PM
  #1981  
TunerMax's Avatar
TunerMax
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 270
Likes: 2
From: KW Ontario Canada
Default

17 PSI with an SC trim Blower!?!? Didn't think that was possible!

Cool man thanks for the imput! I wouldn't be surprised that once the PCV valve is no longer seeing vacuum, hooking it up as such would pretty much see all the Blow by gas just going out the Driver side vent, but I suppose as long as there's sufficient venting happening, it really doesn't matter, right?

Which leads me to question the point of running both VC's to the catch can. If the bulk of the oil will be drawn from one of them once running no return to IM, then you can simply pop an atmospheric vent on the other side and run a smaller Catch Can, right?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2012 | 07:59 PM
  #1982  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by TunerMax
17 PSI with an SC trim Blower!?!? Didn't think that was possible!

Cool man thanks for the imput! I wouldn't be surprised that once the PCV valve is no longer seeing vacuum, hooking it up as such would pretty much see all the Blow by gas just going out the Driver side vent, but I suppose as long as there's sufficient venting happening, it really doesn't matter, right?

Which leads me to question the point of running both VC's to the catch can. If the bulk of the oil will be drawn from one of them once running no return to IM, then you can simply pop an atmospheric vent on the other side and run a smaller Catch Can, right?
it doesn't need to see vacuum to work. If there is any positive pressure in the crankcase it will come out the vents.

The reason both are used is cross sectional area. Why run dual exhaust instead of single? More flow. The last thing you want is restriction when venting crankcase gases.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 02:03 PM
  #1983  
TunerMax's Avatar
TunerMax
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 270
Likes: 2
From: KW Ontario Canada
Default

Ending discussion on my end, don't want to argue, and that's what is going to happen!!! lol. I just disagree with your above comments, s'all good
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 02:34 PM
  #1984  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by TunerMax
Ending discussion on my end, don't want to argue, and that's what is going to happen!!! lol. I just disagree with your above comments, s'all good
Well, when you have built a few cars and tune cars on a regular basis you can use that experience. Until then I would probably listen to all of us on the forums with years of experience and have high hp cars already in the garage.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 03:12 PM
  #1985  
TunerMax's Avatar
TunerMax
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 270
Likes: 2
From: KW Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by binder
Well, when you have built a few cars and tune cars on a regular basis you can use that experience. Until then I would probably listen to all of us on the forums with years of experience and have high hp cars already in the garage.


You're right, Jeff, of course. I completely respect your guys opinions, and I do listen, though it may seem otherwise. I just over-analyze things. Has anyone ever logged actual CC pressure, or is it more of a 'it works' type experience?
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 04:35 PM
  #1986  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by TunerMax


You're right, Jeff, of course. I completely respect your guys opinions, and I do listen, though it may seem otherwise. I just over-analyze things. Has anyone ever logged actual CC pressure, or is it more of a 'it works' type experience?
sorry, I'm blunt so take it with anger in the voice. I have to tell myself the same thing when I don't understand something a long time tuner is doing. I usually get a few opinions and if they are all the same I do it that way unless I can find someone else that vastly opposes the majority.

Raj (rcdash) on here I think did some logs and there were a few guys in the large crankcase vent thread by Jet Pilot. Open breather into catch can showed little to no pressure build up in the crankcase from what I remember.
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2012 | 05:33 PM
  #1987  
TunerMax's Avatar
TunerMax
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 270
Likes: 2
From: KW Ontario Canada
Default

Ok, I've read those threads (panned through previously and just re-read again), they mostly mention utilizing a system similar to most, which is similar to the OEM setup I posted in the diagram above.

Granted the concept of venting both of them isn't a bad one, but if you're doing it that way, what's the purpose of having a catch can at all? Why not just install a breather with a filter on bolt VC's and that's it? I fail to see the difference, unless it somehow relieves part of the stink?

It was those threads and some head scracthing that brought this inquiry on for me personally. Hence mentioning Drilling out/modding the stock PCV.

The threads, specifically mentioning JCDASH's setup, and the JETPILOT thread:

http://www.*********.com/forums/119-...case-vent.html

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-induction/403905-crankcase-ventilation-mod-w-pics.html


Which helps me realize that this whole topic would be better suited for that thread, so I'll pop an inquiry/idea there to see if it helps my understanding.

A quote from rcdash that is precisely my feelings on this, and part of why I'd like to see some measure of vacuum in the CrankCase:

Originally Posted by rcdash
Using 2 breathers right on the valve covers pretty much eliminates any chance of crankcase pressure build up and will work just fine. I like a fresh air pull through set up a bit better since it doesn't smell as much, helps to actively pull fuel vapors out, and helps to maintain vacuum in the crankcase for better ring sealing during idle/cruise (consider the pressure differential between the crankcase and combustion chamber during decel - oil will move in that direction).

I think for any FI setup, drilling out the PCV and opening up the driver's side valve cover orifice a bit is always helpful. My driver's side valve cover hasn't been touched, so that is a point of restriction in my setup which I haven't addressed because the setup is working fine as is. As blow by increases with engine age, I may need to drill that out...

Last edited by TunerMax; Oct 25, 2012 at 05:43 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2012 | 05:39 AM
  #1988  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Catch can is only used to "catch" oil. That is why a person uses it. With just breathers oil will come out when they vent.

The point of drilling the pcv out is to get a larger hole in order to vent better. The stock opening on that pcv is very tiny and restrictive. Since there is no connection to the manifold anymore there is no reason to have a check valve stopping the boost leak at the manifold.

The pull through is a great idea for idle and cruise so it will eliminate the smell. Since the crankcase will force the gases out under boost it really won't change much under boost. I had mine set up that way with a series of check valves from my catch can to the manifold (some people put it into the intake pre-turbo). It didn't work out so well for me and caused excess pressure in the crankcase and blew my front timing seal out on the highway. After tearing that apart and replacing it I went back to my standard vented catch can and don't have any problems in pressure build up.

To paraphrase in my own words Occam's razor: the simplest hypothesis is the more likely hypothesis.

or the army way : keep it simple stupid

I like simple.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2012 | 08:37 AM
  #1989  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

in the end you are overanalyzing. I was making 17psi and 460whp on my vortech setup with the stock PCV system and absolutely no issue.

Now I just run breathers on the valve covers. My cams dont pull alot of vacuum anymore so no reason to introduce a potential vacuum leak.

The only reason you would tie vacuum into a catch can setup is to reduce smell at idle. Any other time you are barely pulling an vacuum from a manifold source.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2012 | 01:56 PM
  #1990  
TunerMax's Avatar
TunerMax
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 270
Likes: 2
From: KW Ontario Canada
Default

Great responses guys, thanks! That pretty much clears it up for me I think. Recirculate if you want to lessen smell at idle/low load, and just vent it if you want simplicity with better ventilation.

I overanalyze because i like (trying) doing it right the first time around, and I also like my mods to perform as a complete upgrade to the stock system, minimal to no shortcomings/sacrifices. It's for that reason I wanted something similar to the OEM setup but with more venting, and an oil catch in line.

I'll probably try running the stock PCV setup with catch can in line for now (standard Catch can install), and see where that goes. I may even pop a MAP sensor in there if I can find one cheap enough to log where things are at, see if I need to do anything at all.

Thanks again for your help and advice on this one!
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2012 | 04:30 PM
  #1991  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

GM 3 bar is about 40$. You can get gm 2 bar for around 20$ and someone would probably just give you a gm 1 bar. Go to a pick and pull and swipe one for a couple bucks off a camaro.
Reply
Old Oct 27, 2012 | 05:06 PM
  #1992  
TunerMax's Avatar
TunerMax
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 270
Likes: 2
From: KW Ontario Canada
Default

Originally Posted by binder
GM 3 bar is about 40$. You can get gm 2 bar for around 20$ and someone would probably just give you a gm 1 bar. Go to a pick and pull and swipe one for a couple bucks off a camaro.
Sweet thanks for the info Jeff!
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 11:54 AM
  #1993  
BEBO'S ZEE's Avatar
BEBO'S ZEE
Registered User
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 987
Likes: 1
From: West Coast
Default

Im sure others have done this before so who has changed out the original blue vortech couplers? I was thinking of getting some black ones only because the blue doesn't really match anything in my engine bay. Any advise on where to pick some up?
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2012 | 08:27 AM
  #1994  
the3kgt2's Avatar
the3kgt2
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by BEBO'S ZEE
Im sure others have done this before so who has changed out the original blue vortech couplers? I was thinking of getting some black ones only because the blue doesn't really match anything in my engine bay. Any advise on where to pick some up?
You can either pick them up at a site like siliconeintakes.com or search eBay for some quality couplers. There are various quality levels of silicone couplers on eBay so choose wisely. Do a search for "vibrant coupler" on eBay...I ordered a few of those and they're top quality.

http://vibrantperformance.com/catalo...1073_1141_1168

Last edited by the3kgt2; Oct 29, 2012 at 08:29 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2012 | 07:37 PM
  #1995  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Silicone intakes has some nice quality for a great price. Vibrant are nice as well but a little more expensive.

While you are at it get some t-bolt clamps.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2012 | 10:36 AM
  #1996  
- bigc -'s Avatar
- bigc -
New Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Default

snapped this yesterday during setup at SEMA...anyone up for the challenge?

Name:  blower.jpg
Views: 149
Size:  310.1 KB
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2012 | 10:42 AM
  #1997  
OldManZ350's Avatar
OldManZ350
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 230
From: Florida
Default

Here is a V-2/V-3 vs the V28-123
Attached Thumbnails vortech FAQ: read this before asking vortech questions-news_vortech_v28_front_big.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2012 | 05:50 PM
  #1998  
TunerMax's Avatar
TunerMax
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 270
Likes: 2
From: KW Ontario Canada
Default

BAHAHAHAHAHA

love it
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 12:37 PM
  #1999  
SkyZ33's Avatar
SkyZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Anyone have a hard time to check engine oil level due to the dip stick is close to the piping of Vortech? Lol...
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 06:50 AM
  #2000  
binder's Avatar
binder
New Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 7
From: terre haute, IN; STL, MO
Default

Originally Posted by SkyZ33
Anyone have a hard time to check engine oil level due to the dip stick is close to the piping of Vortech? Lol...
No problems. And all intakes run right by the dipstick.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:37 AM.