Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Amazing Breakthrough following DIY Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 09:56 AM
  #81  
JuniorTT's Avatar
JuniorTT
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Randy,

Let me know when you get the motor out. We have to start by checking the oil pressure problem first. You cant give them an accurate oil pressure since we never had good pressure. Also if the turbo died from OIL starvation and or contamination you wont need the restrictors the next time around.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 09:57 AM
  #82  
Kenk2's Avatar
Kenk2
Professional
Premier Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: Home
Default

Originally Posted by rrmedicx
Whoa, Whoa, I don't cut corners! Someone else said that, not me! Ken, can't you tell just by the parts I chose to use, that I did not cut any corners. CJM stage 2 upgrade was installed to repair a broken piece from the stage 1 where the original under car line meets the CJ SS feed line up to the rails. Simple upgrade/fix.
That's it.
Thats Not It...

If I remember correctly, you totally removed the little yellow piece shown below, because you didnt know what to do with it..?? That IMO, is cutting corners..
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 09:58 AM
  #83  
JuniorTT's Avatar
JuniorTT
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Kenk2
IMHO, I think your turbos are fine... I honestly hope I am 100% wrong... Cutting corners in a build is not something you do with this or any car.. When we talked on the phone about your tuning, you mentioned about the issue you had with your CJM Return Fuel System.. Now I am not saying this has anything to do with that but if you cut a corner there, where else were you not 100%?
The car had the DEATH WHINE... Its a notorious and unmistakable sound. Whine, and then smoke... All from the driver side. Not to mention oil in the inlet of the turbo..
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 05:18 PM
  #84  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

"Originally Posted by Kenk2
IMHO, I think your turbos are fine... I honestly hope I am 100% wrong... Cutting corners in a build is not something you do with this or any car.. When we talked on the phone about your tuning, you mentioned about the issue you had with your CJM Return Fuel System.. Now I am not saying this has anything to do with that but if you cut a corner there, where else were you not 100%?"

You're killing me Ken. LOL The fuel system was not a problem before the stage 2 upgrade, nor is it a problem now. There was never a problem relating fuel when I had the turbonetics and there is no fuel related problem now. The temporary leak I had was due to a failure of the compression fitting.

Other than that, if I go system by system, I can guarantee 100% on each component just for you Ken...

cylinder Heads install w/torque specs in hand 100%
cam install w/torque specs met 100%
valve covers install 100%
timing cover to spec o-rings 100%
The list goes on.
Down to the turbo install 100%
I already admitted my only flaw on original install was my failure to include the 2 o-rings when installing the upper oil pan, so I guess I failed on that component. That is what lead to my oil leak situation before I got to the point where I am now. (Thanks for reminding me) But that was not cutting corners, I simply didn't know I needed them. Everything else worked out very well I think.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2007 | 06:22 PM
  #85  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Randy, for what it's worth, if its hasnt been done already, do a quick compression check and a leak down if you have the proper tools...before you take the engine out. Whenever we see a smoky car, I always eliminate the big nut first (the engine). I have seen smoky cars come in, with chipped ring lands, still make good power and drive normally. Not saying that is what happened, but just do it. It reminds of the situation with Todd a while back. Car ran fine, but started smoking at the track. Thought it was the turbos....repaired them....still had an issue...ending up being the engine.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 06:15 AM
  #86  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

Hey Sharif, Thanks. You are the second person to suggest the compression test, so I guess I will try to get that accomplished before dismantling. Thank you. I'll let you know what I find. Any idea what is the normal range for an 8.5:1 compression engine set-up?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2007 | 06:49 AM
  #87  
Sharif@Forged's Avatar
Sharif@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Performance
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,733
Likes: 1
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by rrmedicx
Hey Sharif, Thanks. You are the second person to suggest the compression test, so I guess I will try to get that accomplished before dismantling. Thank you. I'll let you know what I find. Any idea what is the normal range for an 8.5:1 compression engine set-up?
Consistency between the cylinders is the most important thing. Every engine is going to vary, but anywhere for 125psi to 160psi is normal for a low comp VQ35. They just need to be relatively consistent between the holes.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 05:50 PM
  #88  
chopperman's Avatar
chopperman
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Any Updates on the rebuild?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 07:50 PM
  #89  
Goku350z2007's Avatar
Goku350z2007
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: Rahway, N.J.
Default

yes, he swapped the twin turbos for a pair of twin tities : )
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 07:26 AM
  #90  
failsafe306's Avatar
failsafe306
Registered User
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,040
Likes: 1
From: OK
Default

Originally Posted by Goku350z2007
yes, he swapped the twin turbos for a pair of twin tities : )
He got a sex change? What?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 07:33 AM
  #91  
doug's Avatar
doug
New Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,838
Likes: 35
From: Apex, NC
Default

Originally Posted by Goku350z2007
yes, he swapped the twin turbos for a pair of twin tities : )
"i wish i had 4 hands to give them ******* 4 thumbs down"
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #92  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

Yeah, I did a compression test about 2 weeks ago and found that the driver side was weaker than the passenger side.

Driver side Passenger side
Cylinder 2 135 Cylinder 1 150
cylinder 4 140 Cylinder 3 150
cylinder 6 135 Cylinder 5 150

Today I just succeeded in pulling the engine and tranny out. It took the majority of the day. My next day to look into the potentially damaged parts will be this Wednesday. That's when I will have the turbo's off and in my hands.
Kyle said he wants the motor back to check it out.
I hope to ship it out Wednesday.
That's all for now.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #93  
Jason333's Avatar
Jason333
hi
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,056
Likes: 0
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Default

Originally Posted by rrmedicx
Yeah, I did a compression test about 2 weeks ago and found that the driver side was weaker than the passenger side.

Driver side Passenger side
Cylinder 2 135 Cylinder 1 150
cylinder 4 140 Cylinder 3 150
cylinder 6 135 Cylinder 5 150

Today I just succeeded in pulling the engine and tranny out. It took the majority of the day. My next day to look into the potentially damaged parts will be this Wednesday. That's when I will have the turbo's off and in my hands.
Kyle said he wants the motor back to check it out.
I hope to ship it out Wednesday.
That's all for now.
Damn man. Big delays

I hope everything works out for you. Good luck!
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 06:45 PM
  #94  
merlin3's Avatar
merlin3
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: ohio
Default

heh, hope it's not from running too lean trying to make that kind of hp on that psi. Good luck bro, you've had some of the worst luck.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #95  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

It will all come together in due time. I'm in no rush. I had some great luck getting some space to work on my car and having access to a lift. This was the biggest gift I could ask for...considering its winter time. Its not exactly as easy as working in my spacious back yard. LOL
Anyway, things can only get better. The engine is out and I will be checking out the turbos Wednesday. Not exactly sure what to look for, but anyway, I'll be bringing them back to my dealer for a thorough check up.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 03:56 AM
  #96  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by rrmedicx
Yeah, I did a compression test about 2 weeks ago and found that the driver side was weaker than the passenger side.

Driver side Passenger side
Cylinder 2 135 Cylinder 1 150
cylinder 4 140 Cylinder 3 150
cylinder 6 135 Cylinder 5 150

Today I just succeeded in pulling the engine and tranny out. It took the majority of the day. My next day to look into the potentially damaged parts will be this Wednesday. That's when I will have the turbo's off and in my hands.
Kyle said he wants the motor back to check it out.
I hope to ship it out Wednesday.
That's all for now.
I knew it Randy...Sorry to hear that,hope everything works out.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 05:21 AM
  #97  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

Thanks Julian.
But even with this info, I am still not 100% for sure where it went wrong. As Sharif stated, it is normal for a low compression engine to yield results anywhere from 125-160psi per cylinder.
I am sending it back to Kyle just to be 100% for sure, meanwhile the turbos will get checked out as well.
I'll update you guys as I find out anything new.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 06:02 AM
  #98  
Julian@MRC's Avatar
Julian@MRC
Banned
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,510
Likes: 0
From: Spotswood NJ
Default

Originally Posted by rrmedicx
Thanks Julian.
But even with this info, I am still not 100% for sure where it went wrong. As Sharif stated, it is normal for a low compression engine to yield results anywhere from 125-160psi per cylinder.
I am sending it back to Kyle just to be 100% for sure, meanwhile the turbos will get checked out as well.
I'll update you guys as I find out anything new.
Yes, but the "consistancy" amongst the cylinders is the most important.All the lower compression cyliders on your compression test, are all on one side. Which concearns me greatly,especially if that was the side the smoke was comming from on all of the dyno pulls, and the supposid bad turbo. The smoke would indicate a damaged ringland on the pistons, and this would show a lower compression.
The "Death Whine" Junior described usually indicates broken or damaged compressor blades.
Now if the low compression is on the same side of the "Death Whine", the pistons or ringlands may have cracked up a bit and shot some pieces of metal into the exhaust side of the turbine,destroying the blades,causing the "Death Whine".
But hey, what do I know,Im only internet diagnosing,and FYIFYI, we have not tuned any REAL cars.. FYIFYI..

My theory, is one side of the motor went leaner than the other and detonated the pistons to crap first shot, and cracked the ringlands,causing the smoke.Further attempts to keep tuning, sent pieces of pistons/rings, into the turbo, thus destroying the turbo blades, causing the "Death Whine" Junior described. The damage to the pistons got worse as the tuning session went on, which explains the very high numbers in the onset, followed by the numbers drasically reducing as the smoke worsened and the "Death Whine" started.
This is why it is VERY crucual on a Twin turbo set up to monitor both sides of the engines A/F ratio, as we do with dual O2 sensors. On a single set up it is not really possible to do this unless you catch the signal at the manifold.
I would ask Junior, if he was monitoring BOTH sides for A/F,? What the A/F was on both sides? What the knock count was? Was the stock ECU pulling timing?
perhaps these answers will help you narrow down what exactly went wrong.

Last edited by Julian@MRC; Dec 18, 2007 at 06:05 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 06:18 AM
  #99  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

I appreciate your input. Definitely something to think about. But as you said, you and I are both just speculating (internet diagnosing). Once I get the engine back to Texas, I will get some more definitive answers from Kyle and I can move forward from there.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2007 | 06:25 AM
  #100  
rrmedicx's Avatar
rrmedicx
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 4
From: NY
Default

I didn't realize it was possible to monitor A/F on both sides when tuning.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:33 AM.