Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Another built motor Vortech dreamer thread.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 3, 2015 | 09:52 PM
  #861  
Resmarted's Avatar
Resmarted
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 64
From: ur face
Default

Originally Posted by OldManZ350
There have been people with a similar setup, 6 rib with a TimRod Radius Rod hold to 26psi.

That said, if I were to do a Ysi I'd go to a 10 rib serp and a much wider Cog.

It's not a simple as just changing out the pullies. Also the crank, PS, tensioner and Alt pullies would need to be custom made. And this is leaving the SC'er in about the same place. I put some work into this a few years back. It's about $2500+ for the custom pullies and you would also need 10 rib idlers, but those are available if you look hard enough.

I'd also think about a tandem Bracket setup much like a mustang YSi kit, but I must say with solid motor mounts and a TimRod Radius Rod the stock bracket becomes pretty stout!
Look we've heard the fckn tim rod radius plug a million times. FFS Josh has one. I know you've done a lot for the vortech z community, and I commend you on it, but the radius rod is not the perfect solution.

I don't understand why, but nobody on here has tried the pulley coating, and that has made all the difference in the domestic 6 rib cars.

The radius rod is scary to me, because you're solid mounting a plate connected to the engine to the chassis. The amount of flex I saw on Josh's voretech bracket scared me, and I think that we need to look at that seriously. Solid mounts or not, you're fixing a dynamic piece to the chassis, and that generally isn't good. Fortunately it helps with the flex that is already happening, but in general that much tension against the crank is not healthy either.


I think that getting more grip at the pulley is totally do able with larger pullies+coating, and higher rpm to compensate. Will it make boost as quickly? No. Will it have as aggressive of a torque curve? No. But the reduced load against the bearings will be worth it in my book. I'm going to be attempting this on my car, and I think that just going around preaching "TIM ROD RADIUS KIT" is silly, and not the only way to skin the cat.

Larger pullies make the actual grip needed on the pulley surface lower, as you have a larger pulley to turn the s/c etc (greater force multiplier), and increased friction will always always help. Increased belt tension is always a help too, but when you've got so much tension in the belt that you're causing this fat piece of aluminum to flex back and fourth, causing more belt slip, that's not good for the crank. It's not good for the bearings. It's not a proper solution.

I hate to be that "d!ck" on the internet, but it needs to be said.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 11:57 AM
  #862  
OldManZ350's Avatar
OldManZ350
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 230
From: Florida
Default

Everybody has an Opinion!
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 12:08 PM
  #863  
OldManZ350's Avatar
OldManZ350
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 230
From: Florida
Default

Hay Josh, read this thread. Funny, after the post today on you thread.

https://my350z.com/forum/forced-indu...00whp-z33.html
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2015 | 02:38 PM
  #864  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

Did some Things today..

Name:  D65B9D34-4C77-4065-B7A8-97A29253EDA5.jpg
Views: 108
Size:  201.8 KB

Mocked this up today. Everything fits pretty good. Has good clearance. The black piping is because I ran out of the shiny stuff. But is all 3". Just need to go by and get it welded up to get rid of the couplers.

Name:  F7025238-3035-4F07-A1EC-7855A791E459.jpg
Views: 108
Size:  233.8 KB
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 07:53 AM
  #865  
Threads's Avatar
Threads
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Default

Originally Posted by Resmarted
Look we've heard the fckn tim rod radius plug a million times. FFS Josh has one. I know you've done a lot for the vortech z community, and I commend you on it, but the radius rod is not the perfect solution.

I don't understand why, but nobody on here has tried the pulley coating, and that has made all the difference in the domestic 6 rib cars.

The radius rod is scary to me, because you're solid mounting a plate connected to the engine to the chassis. The amount of flex I saw on Josh's voretech bracket scared me, and I think that we need to look at that seriously. Solid mounts or not, you're fixing a dynamic piece to the chassis, and that generally isn't good. Fortunately it helps with the flex that is already happening, but in general that much tension against the crank is not healthy either.


I think that getting more grip at the pulley is totally do able with larger pullies+coating, and higher rpm to compensate. Will it make boost as quickly? No. Will it have as aggressive of a torque curve? No. But the reduced load against the bearings will be worth it in my book. I'm going to be attempting this on my car, and I think that just going around preaching "TIM ROD RADIUS KIT" is silly, and not the only way to skin the cat.

Larger pullies make the actual grip needed on the pulley surface lower, as you have a larger pulley to turn the s/c etc (greater force multiplier), and increased friction will always always help. Increased belt tension is always a help too, but when you've got so much tension in the belt that you're causing this fat piece of aluminum to flex back and fourth, causing more belt slip, that's not good for the crank. It's not good for the bearings. It's not a proper solution.

I hate to be that "d!ck" on the internet, but it needs to be said.
Not to hijack, but I actually have a coated pulley that's being used with my T-Trim. Having issues getting a properly sized belt with my ATi Crank Pulley, so I haven't been able to get good enough numbers to get numbers/tuned/dyno. I'll be using the radius rod as well however, FWIW.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 01:52 PM
  #866  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

My buddy at GE blasted my 3.12 pulley with white aluminum oxide 20 grit

Name:  21CA59D0-F7B2-4B2B-9647-A1E259E7E30C.jpg
Views: 106
Size:  231.5 KB
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 01:56 PM
  #867  
Conway_160's Avatar
Conway_160
New Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 357
From: Pan Handle
Default

Doing it to the 2.87 as well? Or does that depend on how much slip you get with the 3.12?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2015 | 02:15 PM
  #868  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

Gonna see how this holds up first. My friend can do it anytime for free. It was an idea we had that didn't cost anything. Gonna see what it does.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 02:43 AM
  #869  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

With the different pulley setup I'm doing now, blower should be spinning around 67k if I rev up to 7500 with this 3.12 pulley. Have a ati crank pulley on the way thanks to Cux. Only thing left to buy is the 27t blower cog. Have my piping at my friends getting ready to be welded up.


Edit, blower will actually be spinning around 71k at 7500rpms. I forgot I have a different jack shaft cog, just redid the vortech calculator.

Last edited by meanz; Oct 8, 2015 at 08:12 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 08:52 AM
  #870  
Threads's Avatar
Threads
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Default

Originally Posted by meanz
With the different pulley setup I'm doing now, blower should be spinning around 67k if I rev up to 7500 with this 3.12 pulley. Have a ati crank pulley on the way thanks to Cux. Only thing left to buy is the 27t blower cog. Have my piping at my friends getting ready to be welded up.


Edit, blower will actually be spinning around 71k at 7500rpms. I forgot I have a different jack shaft cog, just redid the vortech calculator.
If you don't mind, can you let me know if you experience any issues installing your new belt with the new ATi crank pulley. For me, it's almost impossible to get the proper size belt on there, and I think it has to do with the bigger crank pulley being so much closer to the tensioner.

With a new belt, I can get a bigger belt on, but the tensioner does not provide enough tension. With a belt that "should" fit well, it's feels impossible to get the belt on with the tensioner all the way down.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 09:17 AM
  #871  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

Could you add an extra idler into the mix and take up the extra slack with the bigger belt? That's what I'm going to try and do if I run into that problem.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 09:18 AM
  #872  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

And also on my old setup with a fresh belt. I had to use a pry bar to get the belt on. Was very tight to get on.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2015 | 12:06 PM
  #873  
OldManZ350's Avatar
OldManZ350
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 230
From: Florida
Default

That's the way to do it!

Originally Posted by meanz
Could you add an extra idler into the mix and take up the extra slack with the bigger belt? That's what I'm going to try and do if I run into that problem.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 04:54 PM
  #874  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

Gonna be throwing it back together tomorrow.

Name:  2FA5DFEB-E95E-4B67-8975-F27AA9E33A42.png
Views: 115
Size:  560.8 KB
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 05:03 PM
  #875  
OldManZ350's Avatar
OldManZ350
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 230
From: Florida
Default

Looking Good Josh! You did a nice job.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2015 | 05:33 PM
  #876  
Threads's Avatar
Threads
New Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Default

Originally Posted by meanz
And also on my old setup with a fresh belt. I had to use a pry bar to get the belt on. Was very tight to get on.
I think I'm going to try a variable tensioner in place of one of the pulleys on the vortech bracket. The hope being I can run a properly sized belt AND reduce some belt slip with the tensioner. The tensioner is relatively cheap, so if it works, great. If not, no big deal.

And OMG, that piping is just sex.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 01:55 AM
  #877  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

Seeing 20 psi and it pulls hard. I'll update with some pics later. Didn't change pulleys yet. Just tightened belt more. Pulls hard!
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 07:08 AM
  #878  
Conway_160's Avatar
Conway_160
New Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 357
From: Pan Handle
Default

Is this with the new coated 3.12 Pulley?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 08:43 AM
  #879  
meanz's Avatar
meanz
Thread Starter
New Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 57
From: greenville, sc
Default

No change in pulleys yet. Same setup.
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2015 | 03:15 PM
  #880  
Conway_160's Avatar
Conway_160
New Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 357
From: Pan Handle
Default

So at this rate you may not have to change pulleys?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:20 PM.