750HP Procharged 350Z? YES YOU CAN!
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
750HP Procharged 350Z? YES YOU CAN!
I spoke to tech at ATI this morning and discussed the potential max output of the ATI/350Z/C2 compressor/intercooler combo. If you build the motor low compression and build it stout enough the current ATI-Procharger C2 will handle up to 750hp with the IC that comes with the kit. They will sell you the correct pullies for the install. The max impellor RPM listed in the manual is incorrect. There is plenty more to be had with the kit in its current form. Thought you'd all like to know if you didn’t already. The tech I spoke to said the max RPM on the C2 is around 80k. The manual says 65k. Apparently the manual is incorrect.
#3
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually the manual says 80k and the max safe range is closer to 100k. Of course there is no warranty associated with using the compressor at higher speeds. The issue w/ 750hp is engine management at this point. As things stand right now I believe Motec is the best bet. I will have a completed motor finished in a few weeks and will most likely be using the M800 with a completed upgraded fuel sys(w/ return). Will keep you posted.
Robin
Robin
#4
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by abogada001
Actually the manual says 80k and the max safe range is closer to 100k. Of course there is no warranty associated with using the compressor at higher speeds. The issue w/ 750hp is engine management at this point. As things stand right now I believe Motec is the best bet. I will have a completed motor finished in a few weeks and will most likely be using the M800 with a completed upgraded fuel sys(w/ return). Will keep you posted.
Robin
Actually the manual says 80k and the max safe range is closer to 100k. Of course there is no warranty associated with using the compressor at higher speeds. The issue w/ 750hp is engine management at this point. As things stand right now I believe Motec is the best bet. I will have a completed motor finished in a few weeks and will most likely be using the M800 with a completed upgraded fuel sys(w/ return). Will keep you posted.
Robin
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by abogada001
Actually the manual says 80k and the max safe range is closer to 100k. Of course there is no warranty associated with using the compressor at higher speeds. The issue w/ 750hp is engine management at this point. As things stand right now I believe Motec is the best bet. I will have a completed motor finished in a few weeks and will most likely be using the M800 with a completed upgraded fuel sys(w/ return). Will keep you posted.
Robin
Actually the manual says 80k and the max safe range is closer to 100k. Of course there is no warranty associated with using the compressor at higher speeds. The issue w/ 750hp is engine management at this point. As things stand right now I believe Motec is the best bet. I will have a completed motor finished in a few weeks and will most likely be using the M800 with a completed upgraded fuel sys(w/ return). Will keep you posted.
Robin
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My intention is to change the L/S to a Nismo there won't be traction control via the VSS sys. ABS should work fine though. As far as I know there is no plug and play unit available right now. There are certainly some trade-offs with high boost high HP standalone systems the stock traction control is one of them.
As to many other solutions out there, there seem to be plenty of mechanical sys. available but the EM issues are not really up to par or at least up to maximizing potential. Seems like most have fuel systems maxed out and reflashes on the ECU. It would be nice to have an affordable ECU replacement with things like WB O2 feedback, loggging, etc. I would venture to guess that is the reason there are only a few cars over the 400rwhp mark and really none that have lasted over 500hp(at least that I have seen).
Robin
As to many other solutions out there, there seem to be plenty of mechanical sys. available but the EM issues are not really up to par or at least up to maximizing potential. Seems like most have fuel systems maxed out and reflashes on the ECU. It would be nice to have an affordable ECU replacement with things like WB O2 feedback, loggging, etc. I would venture to guess that is the reason there are only a few cars over the 400rwhp mark and really none that have lasted over 500hp(at least that I have seen).
Robin
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by bobowah
this is great!!! but how much money are you going to spend on converting your car to a low compression motor and all the ecu work that's necessary...
this is great!!! but how much money are you going to spend on converting your car to a low compression motor and all the ecu work that's necessary...
Seriously this is no Joke..Robin is droping some serious coin into her car and if she can get a good engine management to work with the car..Well..Then, just FEAR HER!!!!
The problem is MOTEC is some SERIOUS cash and a friend of mine already had The factory techs from MOTEC come down and map his car for it..But he is still undecided right now,but for him $$$$ is no issue he planned well in advance for this project..
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is another thread going now about the stand alone HKS FCON V-Pro. The writer mentioned that they now have a 350z harness. I know very little about this, but Robin, you might want to take a look. He even has links to the products. They are supposed to be on sale now. He claims to have purchased the FCON, wiring adaptor, MAP+AIT sensors, and knock amp+wideband for around $2000 I think. Just thought this would be helpful.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
THanks, I talked to Charles a few months ago about this very thing as well as getting his block sleeved etc. I just sent him a PM so hopefully this will be a good solution!!!
Robin
Robin
#12
Originally posted by peptidbond
There is another thread going now about the stand alone HKS FCON V-Pro. The writer mentioned that they now have a 350z harness. I know very little about this, but Robin, you might want to take a look. He even has links to the products. They are supposed to be on sale now. He claims to have purchased the FCON, wiring adaptor, MAP+AIT sensors, and knock amp+wideband for around $2000 I think. Just thought this would be helpful.
There is another thread going now about the stand alone HKS FCON V-Pro. The writer mentioned that they now have a 350z harness. I know very little about this, but Robin, you might want to take a look. He even has links to the products. They are supposed to be on sale now. He claims to have purchased the FCON, wiring adaptor, MAP+AIT sensors, and knock amp+wideband for around $2000 I think. Just thought this would be helpful.
And another $5000+ to map it and tune it..
#13
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by daking350
And another $5000+ to map it and tune it..
And another $5000+ to map it and tune it..
I don’t need someone to tune my Z. I will not pay anyone for it.
There should be a standalone solution out soon. I'll be waiting.
HKS and there dealer only cr@p is about like having to see a doctor for nicotine patches! That was pretty stupid back in the day! Nicotine was legal in tobacco products but not legal in the quitting tobacco use products? WTF!
If you cant see it the similarity I am trying to draw its this; ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY AND NOT ABOUT THE CUSTOMER!
#14
Charter Member #19
iTrader: (1)
The first person (i.e. moron) to kill himself with multiple nicotine patches would sue the company beyond belief. THAT is the reason they make you see a doctor first. So you can then just SUE THE DOCTOR instead of them.
You can thank the malpractice/product liability lawyers for your having to see a doc to get them. It's not about money unless you mean the money the attorney gets for the lawsuit and the money the company doesn't want to lose as a result.
Someone in another thread mentioned that the FDA withholds cancer drugs for people dying of cancer. Guess what. It's the same thing here.
You can thank the malpractice/product liability lawyers for your having to see a doc to get them. It's not about money unless you mean the money the attorney gets for the lawsuit and the money the company doesn't want to lose as a result.
Someone in another thread mentioned that the FDA withholds cancer drugs for people dying of cancer. Guess what. It's the same thing here.
#15
Originally posted by Dr Bonz
The first person (i.e. moron) to kill himself with multiple nicotine patches would sue the company beyond belief. THAT is the reason they make you see a doctor first. So you can then just SUE THE DOCTOR instead of them.
You can thank the malpractice/product liability lawyers for your having to see a doc to get them. It's not about money unless you mean the money the attorney gets for the lawsuit and the money the company doesn't want to lose as a result.
Someone in another thread mentioned that the FDA withholds cancer drugs for people dying of cancer. Guess what. It's the same thing here.
The first person (i.e. moron) to kill himself with multiple nicotine patches would sue the company beyond belief. THAT is the reason they make you see a doctor first. So you can then just SUE THE DOCTOR instead of them.
You can thank the malpractice/product liability lawyers for your having to see a doc to get them. It's not about money unless you mean the money the attorney gets for the lawsuit and the money the company doesn't want to lose as a result.
Someone in another thread mentioned that the FDA withholds cancer drugs for people dying of cancer. Guess what. It's the same thing here.
Any way back on topic..
I think HKS's approach is smart..You obviously would need them to set up the unit with some sort of baseline map to get you up and running..But I would think that after that some very minor changes would be made by the owner as needed..Some times too much control over things is a BAD thing..You would have more idiots killing themselves if they were allowed to write their own prescriptions...
#16
Charter Member #19
iTrader: (1)
Sorry to to off topic again but:
20 to 50 thousand? Are you kidding? I pay more than 100K for malpractice and in Philly, they pay 150-200K!!
Also, the fact that we pay malpractice premiums doesn't mean that people "CAN'T" sue us. They CAN and DO! That's why we HAVE to pay these prices!
Sorry for the rant!
I guess I would get pissed too if I was paying $20000-$50000 a year for malpractice insurance so IDIOTS can not sue you...
Also, the fact that we pay malpractice premiums doesn't mean that people "CAN'T" sue us. They CAN and DO! That's why we HAVE to pay these prices!
Sorry for the rant!
#17
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Dr Bonz
The first person (i.e. moron) to kill himself with multiple nicotine patches would sue the company beyond belief. THAT is the reason they make you see a doctor first. So you can then just SUE THE DOCTOR instead of them.
You can thank the malpractice/product liability lawyers for your having to see a doc to get them. It's not about money unless you mean the money the attorney gets for the lawsuit and the money the company doesn't want to lose as a result.
Someone in another thread mentioned that the FDA withholds cancer drugs for people dying of cancer. Guess what. It's the same thing here.
The first person (i.e. moron) to kill himself with multiple nicotine patches would sue the company beyond belief. THAT is the reason they make you see a doctor first. So you can then just SUE THE DOCTOR instead of them.
You can thank the malpractice/product liability lawyers for your having to see a doc to get them. It's not about money unless you mean the money the attorney gets for the lawsuit and the money the company doesn't want to lose as a result.
Someone in another thread mentioned that the FDA withholds cancer drugs for people dying of cancer. Guess what. It's the same thing here.
As usual Doc you never fail to educate me on your posts. That’s very interesting..... The pharm co's use the doctors insurance to shield themselves from liability! Hell, I'd never have thought of that one. So if something goes wrong they blame the doc for malpractice and try to claim that he mis-prescibed/diagnosed leaving them blameless?
I had to ask
#18
Charter Member #19
iTrader: (1)
Well, in effect, yes. If a drug isn't tested thoroughly by the FDA, and it was sold by a Pharm. company, they would be BIG TIME liable if ANYTHING went wrong.
In the case of the Nicotine patches, again, if it's OTC (with no need for an Rx from a doc) the company has to make absolutley sure it is safe and can't be misused, abused, or that it can't harm anyone.
If it requires an Rx, the doc then has to assume the liability to an extent. Don't get me wrong, the smart attorney will STILL sue the Pharm. company, but now the liability is shared with the doc.
In the case of the Nicotine patches, again, if it's OTC (with no need for an Rx from a doc) the company has to make absolutley sure it is safe and can't be misused, abused, or that it can't harm anyone.
If it requires an Rx, the doc then has to assume the liability to an extent. Don't get me wrong, the smart attorney will STILL sue the Pharm. company, but now the liability is shared with the doc.
#19
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Miami
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Preach on Doc!
The pharm companies aren't the bad guys here. They may "hide"
behind us Docs, but it's only because they don't want to get sued for people who misuse their product. Part of the reason drugs and insurance are so costly is because of the enormous malpractice premiums the companies have to pay to protect themselves. If Doc pays 100k imagine how much Blue Cross, Merck, etc pay for insurance.
Pa is a pretty bad state for malpractice, probably slighlty worse than florida. I work at Jackson Memorial, which is mostly funded publicly. Whick makes it really ironic when you get sued for malpractice by patients who paid absolutely nothing for their care.
The pharm companies aren't the bad guys here. They may "hide"
behind us Docs, but it's only because they don't want to get sued for people who misuse their product. Part of the reason drugs and insurance are so costly is because of the enormous malpractice premiums the companies have to pay to protect themselves. If Doc pays 100k imagine how much Blue Cross, Merck, etc pay for insurance.
Pa is a pretty bad state for malpractice, probably slighlty worse than florida. I work at Jackson Memorial, which is mostly funded publicly. Whick makes it really ironic when you get sued for malpractice by patients who paid absolutely nothing for their care.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
01-02-2022 12:58 PM