Notices
Maintenance & Repair 350Z up keep and diagnosing/fixing problems

Ride Problem? Call..............

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-2003, 02:22 PM
  #81  
Boomer
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: G35c info

Originally posted by Pedal Pusher
The G35c does have a base model that does have 17" wheels and that is the one I drove. Also, I just learned that the G35c shocks are designed to have less rebound than the 350z. That should solve some of the problem. We "think" they will fit with no problems.

I have always felt the stock springs are non progressive. However, they do have a small progressive coil on the first coil. If you look closely at the pics you will see it. The same soruce explained that the mounting bases are designed to be somewhat progressive. None are as truely progressive as Eibach. It sounds like Eibach springs and G35c shocks would be a good test.
Of course, my mistake. The mag test was the 6MT model w/the 18s. When you say the G35C has less rebound, do you mean they are better controlled than the Zs? I am assuming thats correct, tell me if I'm wrong.

Do you think a matchup of Eibachs and the G35C's shocks would be a good combo for the Z? Do you intend to try it? I have to admit, I despair of Nissan doing anything at all to remedy the situation. I have even been looking at coilovers when I said I wouldn't. I'm finally going on a longer trip than before, maybe I will gain some insight into the problem.

I called Steve, the Z expert at NNA, last week and he has not returned my call since last Thursday. Ah, well, I'll call again. Keep me posted, hah!, on what you might decide to do, please. Boomer
Old 03-18-2003, 03:36 PM
  #82  
Pedal Pusher
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Pedal Pusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Boomer re G35c shocks, etc

It is sounding like the Z springs are not designed with enough progressive capability. Progressive springs get progressively stiffer as the car calls for it. Example: weight in the car, hitting a dip in the road, hard corning, etc. I feel the Z works well when the suspension needs to be stiff. The Eibach springs are progressive and should offer a soft ride under light load situations.

The shocks might have too much rebound or stiffness to them. I was told the G35c shocks are softer than the Z. When both the softer shocks and progressive springs are installed it should help our problem.

Not sure what I am going to do. Actually, I would like a progressive spring that lowers the car about 1/2"front and 3/4"rear. Eibach is .8" front and 1.2" rear. I talked to Eibach R&D today and learned their springs are stiffer than the stock springs. However, since they are progressive they are getting good reviews by many on this site. I guess I will procrastinate for a while!
Old 03-18-2003, 03:40 PM
  #83  
fotodad
Registered User
 
fotodad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Bypass Nissan

If you are a Z owner who is completely satisfied with your Z, GREAT! I am genuinely happy for you. Please read this posting if you like, and if you reply, please make your response constructive in nature. I am so tired of responses which belittle the opinions of those who have legitimate concerns. Certainly nothing is perfect, not even the Z. And if the problems where minimal in cost to fix, I would be the first to get my checkbook out. But as more is known about this car and its design, more construction and design miscalculations by Nissan are discovered. These are expensive design flaws and tire changes to make. I don't expect Nissan to pick up the entire tab, but they should make a good-conscience effort.

Since it seems Nissan is going to do little to remedy the springs/shocks/tires concerns which many Z owners obviously have, would it be benificial to email assorted car magazines explaining our concerns with the Z's suspension and stock tires? I have sent three emails to the big three auto magazines explaining my concerns in hopes a follow-up article on the Z can be written. The email may fall on deaf ears, but enough people write in maybe something will be done...can't hurt, can it?

roadandtrack@hfnm.com
editors@caranddriver.com
To contact Motor Trend, go to their website motortrend.com, scroll to the bottom of the home page, click on "contact us," express your feelings.

In fact, to be fair, those who are extremely pleased with their Z should do the same, bu express their satisfaction, instead.
Old 03-18-2003, 04:23 PM
  #84  
sgraham
Registered User
 
sgraham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bloomingdale, IL
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm in between. I was hating the ride but at 1,400 miles now it seems to have softened and lost some of the harshness. Not happy but not hating the ride as much. I don't think it is just getting used to it, I think it has really softened. I had called Nissan and opened a file on it. Still open. Still want NISMO.
Old 03-18-2003, 04:33 PM
  #85  
jmark
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
jmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Greer, S.C.
Posts: 3,932
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally posted by sgraham
I'm in between. I was hating the ride but at 1,400 miles now it seems to have softened and lost some of the harshness. Not happy but not hating the ride as much. I don't think it is just getting used to it, I think it has really softened. I had called Nissan and opened a file on it. Still open. Still want NISMO.
1100 miles and counting. I am still awaiting Nissans response. Overall they have done a fine job especially for the $. My file is open and I really want the NISMO setup........Yes I would have gladly ordered the car with the NISMO set up from the factory. That should be the real track model! I am going to wait a little while and weigh all the options. Several board members have ordered the NISMO kit and will report back. I don't want to go mixing and matching shocks & springs. The cheapest fix so far is to get the Eibachs which like the NISMO springs are progressive. I think the NISMO kit takes the Z handling to the next level with a good ride too.

Last edited by jmark; 03-18-2003 at 04:40 PM.
Old 03-18-2003, 04:37 PM
  #86  
Boomer
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by sgraham
I'm in between. I was hating the ride but at 1,400 miles now it seems to have softened and lost some of the harshness. Not happy but not hating the ride as much. I don't think it is just getting used to it, I think it has really softened. I had called Nissan and opened a file on it. Still open. Still want NISMO.
The more I hear about NISMO, the more I think it should have been the stock suspension. The more I think that, the angrier I get to no good purpose.
Old 03-18-2003, 04:50 PM
  #87  
fotodad
Registered User
 
fotodad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by jmark
1100 miles and counting. I am still awaiting Nissans response. Overall they have done a fine job especially for the $. My file is open and I really want the NISMO setup........Yes I would have gladly ordered the car with the NISMO set up from the factory. That should be the real track model! I am going to wait a little while and weigh all the options. Several board members have ordered the NISMO kit and will report back. I don't want to go mixing and matching shocks & springs. The cheapest fix so far is to get the Eibachs which like the NISMO springs are progressive. I think the NISMO kit takes the Z handling to the next level with a good ride too.
JMARK,

YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD! It would be my guess next year's Z will offer the NISMO kit as an option. I wish it would have been an option this year. I'm somewhat worried that it lowers an already low car. Any thoughts on this? Are there suspension modifications which don't lower the car? And why should we have to invest all this money to make the car the way it should have come out of the factory!?
Old 03-18-2003, 04:58 PM
  #88  
fotodad
Registered User
 
fotodad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default P L E A S E TAKE MY POLL: "Trading it in on a 2004?"

P L E A S E TAKE MY POLL: "Trading it in on a 2004?"

It is found on the "Technical problems, maintenance & questions" thread.

THANKS!
Old 03-18-2003, 05:09 PM
  #89  
jmark
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
jmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Greer, S.C.
Posts: 3,932
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally posted by fotodad
JMARK,

YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD! It would be my guess next year's Z will offer the NISMO kit as an option. I wish it would have been an option this year. I'm somewhat worried that it lowers an already low car. Any thoughts on this? Are there suspension modifications which don't lower the car? And why should we have to invest all this money to make the car the way it should have come out of the factory!?
It lowers the car but not by much. I think less than the Eibachs do. Do a search for the NISMO suspension. I am sure it is mentioned in several threads. I have had less trouble with the front of the Z than the S2000 or Miata I had before. I am still careful with it however......This car is going to have tons of stuff for it like the Miata does.
Old 03-18-2003, 05:12 PM
  #90  
Boomer
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by fotodad
JMARK,

YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD! It would be my guess next year's Z will offer the NISMO kit as an option. I wish it would have been an option this year. I'm somewhat worried that it lowers an already low car. Any thoughts on this? Are there suspension modifications which don't lower the car? And why should we have to invest all this money to make the car the way it should have come out of the factory!?
Yes, there are modifications which don't lower the car, COILOVERS! HKS, TEIN, etc., check VQ's list. They are all height adjustable and the cheapest I've found so far are $1400 and the company is not listed as an authorized dealer for them! What about the owner who doesn't want to lower his ride height, Nissan? No kit of any kind should be necessary for a new sports car. Most days I feel like I'm riding in a BUICK!
Old 03-18-2003, 05:39 PM
  #91  
happypants
Registered User
 
happypants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fotodad,

Just sent a note off to all three mags.

Also check out this thread if you live in the Chicagoland area

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....threadid=22176
Old 03-18-2003, 07:11 PM
  #92  
fotodad
Registered User
 
fotodad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default to Happypants-

Originally posted by happypants
fotodad,

Just sent a note off to all three mags.

Also check out this thread if you live in the Chicagoland area

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....threadid=22176
Thanks for emailing the three magazines. I sent an email to the Tribune and encourage anyone else who has concerns to do the same...NOW, don't wait!
Old 03-18-2003, 07:16 PM
  #93  
fotodad
Registered User
 
fotodad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: P L E A S E TAKE MY POLL: "Trading it in on a 2004?"

Originally posted by fotodad
P L E A S E TAKE MY POLL: "Trading it in on a 2004?"

It is found on the "Technical problems, maintenance & questions" thread.

THANKS!
https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....threadid=23012
Old 03-29-2003, 07:13 AM
  #94  
offlogic
Registered User
 
offlogic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: northeast usa
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Choppy ride indeed!!!!

I agree 101% about the choppy ride. I have already posted this on Z.COM so excuse the repetition; but after a number of months of dormancy, I finally got the Zeezer out for a spin on I-95. Had been looking forward to it all winter. Although I was aware that the ride around my local area seemed a bit stuttery at times I chalked it up to road conditions. Out on I95 on straight flat new Macadam I thought I was getting airsick. My wife concurred. I really like this car for many reasons, but the annoying unrelenting choppy ride did not make me happy. Had I had the opportunity to test drive this baby before throwing my money at Pre-order madness, I might have something else out in my driveway.
YES, this needs a fix and I will be on the 800# posted earlier and I will have this back to my dealership (who won't spend a lot of tears over it) and hope for the best.
P.S. Is there a website or a venue for serious Z problems that Nissan has recognized and doing something about. My dealership tells me nothing and Nissan just annoys me with questionnaires about their service department, but nothing about how I feel abouty the Z!!!
Old 04-04-2003, 08:26 AM
  #95  
offlogic
Registered User
 
offlogic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: northeast usa
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default eibach fix

Originally posted by Boomer
Yes, there are modifications which don't lower the car, COILOVERS! HKS, TEIN, etc., check VQ's list. They are all height adjustable and the cheapest I've found so far are $1400 and the company is not listed as an authorized dealer for them! What about the owner who doesn't want to lower his ride height, Nissan? No kit of any kind should be necessary for a new sports car. Most days I feel like I'm riding in a BUICK!
Do you know anyone who has replaced the springs with Eibachs and has some positive response? According to Discount Tire the web based Eibach source, they say that Nissan still honors the warranty with the Eibach springs especially if installed by Nissan service centers. Any feedback?
Old 04-04-2003, 09:53 AM
  #96  
Pedal Pusher
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Pedal Pusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Is Eibach the answer?

Some owners are reporting positive results with the Eibach springs. Eibach admits that the ride will be firmer. However, most everyone has reported that some of the bounce is gone.
Old 04-04-2003, 10:31 AM
  #97  
Welsh 350Z N
Registered User
 
Welsh 350Z N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I must admit I have noticed the bounce a little but I only have 450 miles on my baby so it hasn't got to bother me to much yet. I put it down to the appalling upstate NY roads. However, the problem obviously exists and in support of the cause I will be calling Nissan. I also tried a different route - I posted a detailed written complaint on their Nissan USA Website. Sometimes the written word has a little more power. I'll let everyone know IF or when they respond.
Old 04-05-2003, 02:43 PM
  #98  
bozhed
Registered User
 
bozhed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Windsor, CA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just a thought for everyone that is experiencing the tire issues.....if Nissan is not doing anything about this I would think that this would actually result in unsafe conditions for those owners who don't understand feathering. You could report the problem to the Consumer Products Safety Commission (actually it is the Dept.of Transportation)
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/ivoq/

On the website
http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/complain/

you can not only file a complaint, you can search to see if others have reported issues. I did a search and found 4 complaints (5 counting mine). One appeared to have been repeated 2x. So that amounts to 4 total complaints.

If they are going to do something about this, defintely need more people to file complaints.
Old 04-05-2003, 07:39 PM
  #99  
Boomer
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: eibach fix

Originally posted by offlogic
Do you know anyone who has replaced the springs with Eibachs and has some positive response? According to Discount Tire the web based Eibach source, they say that Nissan still honors the warranty with the Eibach springs especially if installed by Nissan service centers. Any feedback?
Yes, read earlier posts on this thread and several other threads listing the problems. Jim H has replaced his springs w/Eibachs recently wth very good results. You also need to go to Eibach's website which describes how they work. You can access them directly or through TireRack.com. Any warranty coverage by Nissan is your guess. They lower the car .8"fr and 1.2"rr.

BTW, there are several threads working on the alignment problems, too. Each of you who want to register your displeasure w/Nissan's lack of solutions to the Bounce and Alignment problems can find an outlet for your frustrations by doing a search on, Bounce, Alignment and Feathering.

The biggest problem listed so far is Feathering, which points to the abnormal wear on the inside tread of the front tires. Many of us believe all three issues are related and some of us are drafting a letter to Nissan Top Management. Look for mindfullin and jellege's posts to track it down, add your name, VIN# and Case number from NNA at 1 800 Nissan-1. If you haven't called Nissan North America(NNA), please do it now to register your complaint and join us with your complaints.

I considered the Eibachs, but I don't lower my car at this time. I am waiting for adjustable dampers first.

Last edited by Boomer; 04-05-2003 at 07:59 PM.
Old 04-12-2003, 01:20 PM
  #100  
Slexis200
Registered User
 
Slexis200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Nassau, Long Island NY
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Still no responce from NNA huh? Let us know when one of you gets some feedback, or if it becomes a TSB......


Quick Reply: Ride Problem? Call..............



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:21 AM.