Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Suspension 101

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2011 | 02:48 AM
  #361  
michaelbrown13's Avatar
michaelbrown13
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Default Creaking Noise Returns

I own a 2055 350Z with a few mods, including a slightly lower suspension, with Hotchkis TVS Stage I sway bar and springs, 18" wheels and tires, Rotara Big Brake Kits front and rear, SPC upper (A) control arm and GRreddy strut tower bar. After all these items were installed I had an alignment done and everything was perfect. Then someone told me about end points and how I should have upgraded the end points because of the added stress the Hotchkis sway bars placed on the OEM's, so I ordered and install the SPC end points. Things seemed to work well for a while then I started hearing rattling or creeking from the suspension, especially when I turned into my driveway or went over a bump or pot hole. I had it checked several times at several places and they found nothing. Finally I was told the lower control arm bushings were worn out and needed to be replaced. So, I ordered the OEM replacement arms from Nissan and had them installed and the problem went away, only to return about 3 months later.
I haven't taken the car back to the speed shop that did the suspension work and lower control arm replacement, as I wanted to get feedback from the Forum. I don't want to just replace the lower control arm again, I want to know what the problem is and correct that. Then if the control arm has to be replaced than so be it.
Any good advise would be greatly appreciated.
PM me if you have something good to share.
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2011 | 08:42 PM
  #362  
GT4Zed's Avatar
GT4Zed
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Across the divide
Default Advice needed

Great thread/posts Jason et al
I have had to figured out most on my own and would have save myself some headaches reading this first. My z is a DD and track car in summer and i do all my suspension work myself to convert it from one setup to the other.
My current suspension setup after alot of chopping and changing is almost where i want it but for a few upgrades am about to get. i learnt one thing for sure...you get what you pay for

Car:
- 35th aniversary edition or GT4 edition as its known here across the pond

Engine:
- Various bolt-on mods with UTEC tunning resulting in 270WHP

Transmission:
Japspeed Short shifter(40% throw reduction)

Tyres & wheels:
- 19 x 9.5 ET25 with Michelin pilot sports 2 265/35/19 and 19 x 10.5 ET20 with 295/30/19 MPS2 front and rear respectively

Brakes:
- Ksport 14" BBK all round with 8pot vs 6pot callipers front and rear paired with performance friction 01 race compound pads all round and RBF 660 brake fluid.

Suspension:
- KW variant 3 coilovers OEM setup.
- Ride height 1.8 inches all round
- SPC rear camber arm and toe bolts
- Ichiba front camber arm. Utter rubbish failed with about 6k miles fast road use. no track action even!
- Power end links
- Eibach adjustable swaybars

Upgrades in pipeline:
- Complete whiteline front and rear bushing kit + subframe and diff. (would have liked all SPL but these are pricey
- Tein tie rod and end kit
- SPL front camber arm to take advantage of caster adjustment too. Was going to go for SPC but its to finnicky and not after the read here!
- Cusco etc Toe adjustable radius arm(Not ideal but SPL spring carrier arm too expensive but may not need this if i go for the true coilover setup! But would then need a proper Toe arm most like SPl as it looks top quality)
- SPL lockout kit for both toe and camber
- urethane engine and tranny mounts
- Exedy hypersingle clutch/flywheel combo

Recommendations needed:
- I really like the true rear coilover setup but not sure about the available coilovers for this are near the KW quality? I would appreciate any inputs/reco to convince me otherwise what are Stance GR+ pro like? they look the part but do they walk the walk?

- obviously I have an optimal setup for track work and always willing to try new ideas so I will appreciate some suspension (camber/toe) setup from Jason or any like minded gents here to try out

- i have looked into undercarriage bracing eg GT spec but unsure if they are worth especially with the potential weight penalty. Any any track experiences will be welcome. Might do a half cage at a later stage in lieu to combine safety and rigidity in one go instead.

- Jason do you still make the true rear Toe arm? PM price please

- finally i would like to get upgraded steering rack bushes but can't seem to find a manufactorer for the zed
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 07:51 AM
  #363  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Dook-E
ok, i have been reading a lot on these boards recently since i am thinking about getting a Z and everyone seems to quiver anytime camber and lowering is mentioned. I'm coming from the 240 world and -2.0 is really not that much camber at all for front wheels. Maybe i am reading into this all wrong, but can anyone explain to me what a standard Z drifter would run for front and rear camber? i was thinking something around:

-3.0 ~ -4.0 in the front
-1.5 ~ -2.5 in the rear
First off, most of them dont even know what the camber specs are and just slam and camber their cars and "say" its better........same with the 350z guys so its no different.......

those quivering on this thread and other like it are mostly daily driven owners that want "in spec" alignments to save tires and dont care about looking cool, fads like hella flush, and all dat jazz.......


Originally Posted by Dook-E
why is it on that printout that his car hasn't even hit -2.0 yet and it is screaming with a bright red color like his front suspension is dying?
The stock specs are shown on the first page........-1.33 is the MOST negative you can get and be "green" in spec.......

sure specs like -2.0 and such are beneficial when the car is "set up" correctly for the course, event your preparing for........but to call it an all around good number is silly.......

i tweek my settings all the time......depending where im going! where im racing...etc....

Originally Posted by Dook-E
im not trying to come off as a negative person here, just trying to inquire a little. i figured that the Z's would be really similar to the S-Chassis' but if they arent, im down to learn all the new info i can.
ya, i hear ya.......don't get me wrong either.......most buy coilovers arms and "install it" versus "set it up" correctly.....so those kinda things bother me........especially when they talk ish but dont know what the hell they are talking about!!?!??!

as for S chassis and Z33 chassis suspension! they are WORLDS different!

S chassis is cheaper old school Macpherson strut design........the Z uses a much better SLA suspension design (read first post/page again).......main point "utilizing an upper control arm"..........240's don't have upper control arms...the coilovers themselves take "lateral loads"...........ie, once again machperson strut design vs 350z SLA design...

the Z is a great bang for the buck suspension design on a NOW cheap to buy used car.........track car, etc...

-J

Last edited by JasonZ-YA; Feb 22, 2011 at 07:53 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 07:59 AM
  #364  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mikeyfosure1
So I read most of the first 20 or so posts for this thread.

Just to make sure what I'm understanding is correct...

I am going with GR2 shocks and Tein H-tech springs and will use OEM spring bucket.. that means I don't need rear camber arms correct? Since the bucket acts as a rear camber arm.
The spring bucket is the toe adjustment location, the camber arm is the arm forward of it! You will need a rear camber arm "IF" you are low enough that you cant get into rear specs..........see page 1 for the specs and identification of which arms are which....

Originally Posted by mikeyfosure1
Do I need something different, like different bolts/eccentric washers or is my drop not going to be significant enough that the OEM bucket washers can't adjust that far?
most do two alignments.....one to see if their drop is too low or not to get in spec with the factory eccentric bolts.........if you cant get into spec, then you will need the eccentric bolt kit mentioned many times in this thread....along with rear camber arm etc........once again......once you know how far out of spec you are....

the spl bucket arm is baller!!

Originally Posted by mikeyfosure1
I understand the only option to correct camber in the front are upper control arms. I'm debating on dropping the extra $320 or not...

thanks
The kinetixs arms are 239 shipped..........

its either that or bad inner tire wear........all dependant on your drop height...

-J

Last edited by JasonZ-YA; Feb 22, 2011 at 10:01 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 08:07 AM
  #365  
betamotorsports's Avatar
betamotorsports
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 3
From: La Habra, CA, USA
Default

I guess I'll help Jason out here because I've raced S30s and Z33s. One of the big reason's we run lots of negative camber on the front of the S30 is that is has very little camber gain in bump. So, as the car rolls in the corner you actually lose negative camber in relation to the ground. It gets even worse when the car is lowered to the point that the front LCA is parallel to the ground.

Increasing caster helps reduce that problem and I've run as much a +9 in my racing 240Z. That tends to slow the car down in the corners because you're dragging the inside wheel but it helps putting power down by loading the inside rear wheel. Its a compromise and you compromise in the direction of faster lap times, not what the books or the Internet says.

The Z33 has an order of magnitude better suspension and gains a lot of camber in bump. You generally don't need as much static camber to begin with. Also, wider tires require less static negative camber. On my 350Z I run -1.9 in front and -1 in back all the time (street, autox, track) just because my adjustment is custom offset bushings in front. Too much trouble to adjust back and forth.

Comparing the alignment settings, spring rates, shock valving, etc. between he two cars is basically useless. There is just too much of a difference.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 09:48 AM
  #366  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

^ thank you Beta...

-J
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 10:04 AM
  #367  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by michaelbrown13
I own a 2055 350Z with a few mods, including a slightly lower suspension, with Hotchkis TVS Stage I sway bar and springs, 18" wheels and tires, Rotara Big Brake Kits front and rear, SPC upper (A) control arm and GRreddy strut tower bar. After all these items were installed I had an alignment done and everything was perfect. Then someone told me about end points and how I should have upgraded the end points because of the added stress the Hotchkis sway bars placed on the OEM's, so I ordered and install the SPC end points. Things seemed to work well for a while then I started hearing rattling or creeking from the suspension, especially when I turned into my driveway or went over a bump or pot hole. I had it checked several times at several places and they found nothing. Finally I was told the lower control arm bushings were worn out and needed to be replaced. So, I ordered the OEM replacement arms from Nissan and had them installed and the problem went away, only to return about 3 months later.
I haven't taken the car back to the speed shop that did the suspension work and lower control arm replacement, as I wanted to get feedback from the Forum. I don't want to just replace the lower control arm again, I want to know what the problem is and correct that. Then if the control arm has to be replaced than so be it.
Any good advise would be greatly appreciated.
PM me if you have something good to share.
sounds to me as your talking about endlinks and then bushings on the lower control arms............see page 2 where i give part numbers and pics, along with links to whiteline bushing replacements.

-J
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 11:37 AM
  #368  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by GT4Zed
Great thread/posts Jason et al


Originally Posted by GT4Zed
Suspension:
- KW variant 3 coilovers OEM setup.
- Ride height 1.8 inches all round
- SPC rear camber arm and toe bolts
- Ichiba front camber arm. Utter rubbish failed with about 6k miles fast road use. no track action even!
- Power end links
- Eibach adjustable swaybars
not bad so far....yes, ichiba front arms bite!

Originally Posted by GT4Zed
Upgrades in pipeline:
- Complete whiteline front and rear bushing kit + subframe and diff. (would have liked all SPL but these are pricey
- Tein tie rod and end kit
- SPL front camber arm to take advantage of caster adjustment too. Was going to go for SPC but its to finnicky and not after the read here!
- Cusco etc Toe adjustable radius arm(Not ideal but SPL spring carrier arm too expensive but may not need this if i go for the true coilover setup! But would then need a proper Toe arm most like SPl as it looks top quality)
- SPL lockout kit for both toe and camber
- urethane engine and tranny mounts
- Exedy hypersingle clutch/flywheel combo
great choices.........see my "Drifting 101" thread for more info on tie rods..

Originally Posted by GT4Zed
Recommendations needed:
- I really like the true rear coilover setup but not sure about the available coilovers for this are near the KW quality? I would appreciate any inputs/reco to convince me otherwise what are Stance GR+ pro like? they look the part but do they walk the walk?
Try looking at more upper end units....see here for more details:
https://my350z.com/forum/brakes-and-...ic-thread.html

Originally Posted by GT4Zed
- obviously I have an optimal setup for track work and always willing to try new ideas so I will appreciate some suspension (camber/toe) setup from Jason or any like minded gents here to try out
I wouldn't know with out knowing the track, etc and style to give advice....i set my car up moreso for drifting than anything else........

Originally Posted by GT4Zed
- i have looked into undercarriage bracing eg GT spec but unsure if they are worth especially with the potential weight penalty. Any any track experiences will be welcome. Might do a half cage at a later stage in lieu to combine safety and rigidity in one go instead.
-The front LOWER GT spec under brace is moot.....the k-member is steel, the GT spec brace does little to none there..

- The front fender gtspec braces are good and hidden! lol... those help..

- the rear are helpful as the subframe lugs hang down and they do give more support from flexing the "hanging lugs"........the rear tie brace, and rear whatever they call it brace...lol...

- the chassis under braces im sure help, the a correctly built roll cage will do more for you..........maybe try removing the two black large "W-braces" under the car and stich weld those along with added steel would be more beneficial
over GT spec i would say....

Originally Posted by GT4Zed
- finally i would like to get upgraded steering rack bushes but can't seem to find a manufacturer for the zed
I haven't seen any, but im sure you can find something to work as the rack isn't anything special..........Ive often wondered this as well, but so far haven't seen a need........mine and others I have seen have held up and haven't moved to warrant needing after market...

-J
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 05:24 PM
  #369  
GT4Zed's Avatar
GT4Zed
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: Across the divide
Default

Thanks Jason for your reply which addresses most things.

WRT to the steering bush there is nothing wrong with it but i would have prefered more steering feel rather than the very soft factory bush which absorbs all road feel for the comfort of Joe Public
I will take the OEM bush out when doing my suspoension bushes and see if i can find or adapt a polyurathane bush to work
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2011 | 07:56 PM
  #370  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by GT4Zed
Thanks Jason for your reply which addresses most things.
anytime......anything specific i may have missed, let me know......etc..

Originally Posted by GT4Zed
WRT to the steering bush there is nothing wrong with it but i would have prefered more steering feel rather than the very soft factory bush which absorbs all road feel for the comfort of Joe Public
I will take the OEM bush out when doing my suspoension bushes and see if i can find or adapt a polyurathane bush to work
ya i hear ya.....i havent cared to much as the steering rack has stayed planted.......u are talking about the steering rack bushings correct?

-J
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 03:28 PM
  #371  
dikspiel's Avatar
dikspiel
Chestons Toilet
Premier Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 92
From: Cheston's
Default

Hey Jason, great thread learned a lot by skimming through it.

My suspension goals are for street and very mild track use. (Probably way overkill but I like things done correctly)

My setup so far:

Zeal Function Xs coilovers (true rear setup)
Cusco Sway Bars
SPL Rear Camber Arms
SPL RearTraction links
SPL Front & Rear Endlinks
Whiteline Rear Traction Subrame Urethane Bushing Kit (Not installed yet, willing to replace with something else if necessary)
Custom 4 Point Roll Cage with B-Pillar Gussets and Rear Point Gussets

Parts planning to purchase:
SPL Rear Toe Rods
SPL Front Camber Arms v3
SPL Eccentric Lockout Kit (Do I need 2 of these kits for the rear? One for Toe, one for Camber?)
SPL Front Compression Rod Bushings
SPL Solid Differential Mounting Bushings


Is it ok to mix whiteline urethane bushings with SPL solid bushings? What other bushings would you recommend I purchase?

Also I didn't see this pointed out but it may be a good idea discussing the differences between urethane and solid bushings. I found this article http://www.suspensionwholesale.com/A...d/Default.aspx

Thanks!
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #372  
SuperBlack350z's Avatar
SuperBlack350z
Registered User
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,517
Likes: 4
From: Raleigh, North Carolina
Default

Originally Posted by JasonZ-YA
^ exactly..toe arms can be paired with lock out washers and no more slipping egg shaped "eccentric" washers will be used..

get it?
-J
Jason,

so i have the SPC camber arms and toe bolts sitting in my room. you are saying if i get some toe arms, the toe bolts wouldn't need to installed at all? ANd doesn't slip out of toe spec for a daily driver?

Besides the SPL and Stance toe arms, what other brands are good for a very low car? Thanks bro.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 03:35 PM
  #373  
dikspiel's Avatar
dikspiel
Chestons Toilet
Premier Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 92
From: Cheston's
Default

Superblack you don't need toe bolts if you get toe rods for the rear.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 04:15 PM
  #374  
SuperBlack350z's Avatar
SuperBlack350z
Registered User
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,517
Likes: 4
From: Raleigh, North Carolina
Default

^^ ah ok, nice. Thanks Dikspiel. Adjustment should be the same or better correct? i'm pretty low.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 06:45 PM
  #375  
Dook-E's Avatar
Dook-E
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by JasonZ-YA
First off, most of them dont even know what the camber specs are and just slam and camber their cars and "say" its better........same with the 350z guys so its no different.......

those quivering on this thread and other like it are mostly daily driven owners that want "in spec" alignments to save tires and dont care about looking cool, fads like hella flush, and all dat jazz.......




The stock specs are shown on the first page........-1.33 is the MOST negative you can get and be "green" in spec.......

sure specs like -2.0 and such are beneficial when the car is "set up" correctly for the course, event your preparing for........but to call it an all around good number is silly.......

i tweek my settings all the time......depending where im going! where im racing...etc....



ya, i hear ya.......don't get me wrong either.......most buy coilovers arms and "install it" versus "set it up" correctly.....so those kinda things bother me........especially when they talk ish but dont know what the hell they are talking about!!?!??!

as for S chassis and Z33 chassis suspension! they are WORLDS different!

S chassis is cheaper old school Macpherson strut design........the Z uses a much better SLA suspension design (read first post/page again).......main point "utilizing an upper control arm"..........240's don't have upper control arms...the coilovers themselves take "lateral loads"...........ie, once again machperson strut design vs 350z SLA design...

the Z is a great bang for the buck suspension design on a NOW cheap to buy used car.........track car, etc...

-J
Thanks for the breakdown. I have a full SPL suspension setup for my S14 right now, so once i can finally get rid of this car and get my hands on a Z i will be going the same route. This information really helped me get a head start in the right direction, i appreciate it man.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 06:46 PM
  #376  
Dook-E's Avatar
Dook-E
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by dikspiel
SPL Eccentric Lockout Kit (Do I need 2 of these kits for the rear? One for Toe, one for Camber?)
great question, id like to know this as well.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 06:53 PM
  #377  
dikspiel's Avatar
dikspiel
Chestons Toilet
Premier Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,859
Likes: 92
From: Cheston's
Default

Originally Posted by SuperBlack350z
^^ ah ok, nice. Thanks Dikspiel. Adjustment should be the same or better correct? i'm pretty low.
Much more range of adjustment with a toe rod. Its also the proper way to do it if your slammed. Get the traction links as well so you can remove the midlink from your suspension.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 07:59 PM
  #378  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Dook-E
great question, id like to know this as well.
YES! you need two kits! one for tow and one for camber "SO LONG AS" you have an adjustable camber arm "AND" an adjustable toe arm (true set up) "OR" the SPL pro midlink (OEM set up).


-J
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 08:00 PM
  #379  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by dikspiel
Much more range of adjustment with a toe rod. Its also the proper way to do it if your slammed. Get the traction links as well so you can remove the midlink from your suspension.
Your right, i just dont like your wording......

nothing can be removed completely........it can be "REPLACED with an adjustable part" but not "removed and eliminated"

all three rear lower arms must be used.......if they are replaced with aftermarket adjustable arms, then great, but all 3 must be mounted and used......

im sure you knew that......but i try to be as clear as possible....


-J
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 08:11 PM
  #380  
JasonZ-YA's Avatar
JasonZ-YA
Thread Starter
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,204
Likes: 32
From: San Antonio/I miss DFW, TX
Default

Originally Posted by dikspiel
Hey Jason, great thread learned a lot by skimming through it.

My suspension goals are for street and very mild track use. (Probably way overkill but I like things done correctly)

My setup so far:

Zeal Function Xs coilovers (true rear setup)
Cusco Sway Bars
SPL Rear Camber Arms
SPL RearTraction links
SPL Front & Rear Endlinks
Whiteline Rear Traction Subrame Urethane Bushing Kit (Not installed yet, willing to replace with something else if necessary)
Custom 4 Point Roll Cage with B-Pillar Gussets and Rear Point Gussets
not bad, but i would loose the whiteline subframe bushing kit...go with the sikky manufacturing solid subframe kit....

i say this having read your "planned to purchase" list......

Originally Posted by dikspiel
Parts planning to purchase:
SPL Rear Toe Rods
SPL Front Camber Arms v3
SPL Eccentric Lockout Kit (Do I need 2 of these kits for the rear? One for Toe, one for Camber?)
SPL Front Compression Rod Bushings
SPL Solid Differential Mounting Bushings
awesome list..........yes, you need two for rear since you are getting rear spl toe rods (spring bucket replacement arms).


Originally Posted by dikspiel
Is it ok to mix whiteline urethane bushings with SPL solid bushings? What other bushings would you recommend I purchase?
yes its okay to do so, but there is a much more proper way to doing it.......

FRONT:
well, since you are purchasing SPL front upper control arms - which mount to the car with solid rod ends, AND your purchasing the SPL compression rod bushing, then your best bet is to get the SPL inner translink bushing:

This one:
http://www.importpartspro.com/splflbbiz33z33.html
Now, if you stop and think about it, that is all the "4" spindle to "car" mounting points.......so since they are all solid, they can move freely with out any friction from any one point being a urethane bushing where the others are solids.....get it??

more on front:

So, that leaves the translink "outter" bushing left.......this is the coilover to translink mount location........that one is MOOT and is prefectly acceptable to purchase whiteline over Solid as it doesnt articulate but a few degrees in motion with the lower shock pivot point..

so that saves u a some cash at least.....


Originally Posted by dikspiel
Also I didn't see this pointed out but it may be a good idea discussing the differences between urethane and solid bushings. I found this article http://www.suspensionwholesale.com/A...d/Default.aspx

Thanks!
will read it later, nite.

-J
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:07 PM.