Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Turbonetics Single Turbo Kit..Pics/Videos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2004, 03:18 PM
  #101  
APS
Banned
 
APS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: answers

Originally posted by Turbonetics

A question for Peter...or any other twin manufacturers... do your twin turbo's mount after the CAT's to try and retain the stock location? if so does the turbo's mount under the car or how is the turbine response effected? or oil return to the pan handled? I am sure what ever combination you guy come up with will be great...I have seen some of your other applications (Subaru) and they are very impressive from both the quality of the systems as well as the performance. whatever you guys are doing down under keep it up becasue if there is one thing the forced induction market needs is good quality products. it's great to offer more than one solution, it provided people with options.

Brad
Hi Brad,

Great to catch up with you again (long time no see) and congratulations to Turbonectics for single turbo system.............Knowing you and Turbonectics I'm sure this will be an excellent performance product and I wish you every success.

Now Brad to your question.

We locate the Twin Garrett dual ball beraing Turbos pre cats, this way we can retain the cats in the stock position and with any luck this won't reduce the cat light up time- which I hope will provide APS with every chance of gaining a CARB exemption order for the APS TT system.

As the turbos are mounted above the oil pan height APS utilises a gravity feed for the oil return...............returning the turbo lubrication oil back to the oil pan.

Brad thanks for your kind words on APS products........... like Turbonectics we are very dedicated to thorough engineering and development of turbo products and systems..............as you know we have a good deal of respect for Turbonectics products and the Founder of the Turbonectics business.

It's fantastic to have you guys in the 350Z community..............I know we can work well with you guys at any time and that customers will benefit from your involvement in the Z car

I look foward to catching up with you at SEMA this year.

Peter

APS
Old 09-24-2004, 04:22 PM
  #102  
G3po
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
G3po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nor Cal.
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Re: answers

Originally posted by APS
Hi Brad,

Great to catch up with you again (long time no see) and congratulations to Turbonectics for single turbo system.............Knowing you and Turbonectics I'm sure this will be an excellent performance product and I wish you every success.

Now Brad to your question.

We locate the Twin Garrett dual ball beraing Turbos pre cats, this way we can retain the cats in the stock position and with any luck this won't reduce the cat light up time- which I hope will provide APS with every chance of gaining a CARB exemption order for the APS TT system.

As the turbos are mounted above the oil pan height APS utilises a gravity feed for the oil return...............returning the turbo lubrication oil back to the oil pan.

Brad thanks for your kind words on APS products........... like Turbonectics we are very dedicated to thorough engineering and development of turbo products and systems..............as you know we have a good deal of respect for Turbonectics products and the Founder of the Turbonectics business.

It's fantastic to have you guys in the 350Z community..............I know we can work well with you guys at any time and that customers will benefit from your involvement in the Z car

I look foward to catching up with you at SEMA this year.

Peter

APS
Every TT system I've seen places the snails pre-CAT, as does APS.
From a technical point of view WRT the question:
"mounting Turbos post CAT?" .

Peter , I can't fathom anyone even attempting this . Seems to me that:

a) the CAT (s)would function very poorly, they need high heat to operate. So pretty much whats the point.

b) the CATs wick enourmous heat from the exhaust flow which would seriously reduce Turbo spool efficiency. As would the extraneoisly long plumbing that would be required.

Technically this method sounds like a "loose-loose" propositon.
Old 09-24-2004, 07:16 PM
  #103  
DIGItonium
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
DIGItonium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,836
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Looks like the Turbonetics application fits me more since it involves ECU program and less fiddly with engine management.

Since I'm not much of a racer, but yearn for the the turbo feel and BOV sound... this might suit my price range.

APS TT would be nice though.. :-), but it might be overkill for me.
Old 09-24-2004, 07:32 PM
  #104  
redline350ZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
redline350ZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by djtonium
Looks like the Turbonetics application fits me more since it involves ECU program and less fiddly with engine management.

Since I'm not much of a racer, but yearn for the the turbo feel and BOV sound... this might suit my price range.

APS TT would be nice though.. :-), but it might be overkill for me.
exactly.........especially with all my N/A mods....
Old 09-24-2004, 07:50 PM
  #105  
Juztin
Registered User
iTrader: (9)
 
Juztin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Los Lunas, NM
Posts: 2,027
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

I'd be curious to see the spool characterstics with aftermarket headers like Nismo, etc...
Old 09-24-2004, 11:17 PM
  #106  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Juztin
I'd be curious to see the spool characterstics with aftermarket headers like Nismo, etc...
Ditto. It'd be interesting to see if the extra flow from aftermarket headers actually reduced the spool up time..
Old 09-25-2004, 05:25 AM
  #107  
Jun
350Z-holic
iTrader: (45)
 
Jun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Miami/Kendall, Florida
Posts: 5,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sorry for my ignorant question, but what are the benefits of having a single turbo i/o a twin turbo setup? I know TT will has less lag due to one of them spooling before, but can you guys give me a pro's/con's brief list?
Old 09-25-2004, 08:00 AM
  #108  
Fëanor
Registered User
 
Fëanor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The halls of Mandos
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by MIAPLAYA
Ditto. It'd be interesting to see if the extra flow from aftermarket headers actually reduced the spool up time..
I'd wager that aftermarket headers would hurt spool time since they all have quite a bit more internal volume than the stock headers. That volume will take slightly longer to pressurize, and hence the turbo will take a bit more time to respond.
Old 09-25-2004, 09:18 AM
  #109  
redline350ZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
redline350ZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What is the most efficent boost level of this turbo??????

Im the type of customer that would rather have a smaller turbo that optimizes boost at say 6psi and have to upgrade the turbo later......... 650whp or more capability is a waste right now.....

would turbonetics be able to provide me with a smaller turbo in this setup????

I only want 6psi max for the time being.......maybe a year later I would want more......

Im no expert but 360whp with my N/A mods........3.917 gears and 8lb flywheel would be more than enough.....

This is the right F/I path for me right?????
Old 09-25-2004, 09:37 AM
  #110  
Bahnstoermer
Registered User
 
Bahnstoermer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbus, Moving to Austin
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm, I'm having saving issues with the vids also. No matter what I do, it only saves the link and won't download the target.
Old 09-25-2004, 01:13 PM
  #111  
Street Visionz, Inc.
Banned
iTrader: (68)
 
Street Visionz, Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So Cali
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hehehehe I was at the shop that the turbonetics Z got dynod at yesterday.......put down some interesting numbers. I won't say them but I really want to know the price of this thing. the shop owner said it was a really gorgeous kit.
Old 09-25-2004, 02:03 PM
  #112  
APS
Banned
 
APS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Re: Re: answers

Originally posted by G3po
Every TT system I've seen places the snails pre-CAT, as does APS.
From a technical point of view WRT the question:
"mounting Turbos post CAT?" .

Peter , I can't fathom anyone even attempting this . Seems to me that:

a) the CAT (s)would function very poorly, they need high heat to operate. So pretty much whats the point.

b) the CATs wick enourmous heat from the exhaust flow which would seriously reduce Turbo spool efficiency. As would the extraneoisly long plumbing that would be required.

Technically this method sounds like a "loose-loose" propositon.
Yeah I agree it's best to have the turbos positioned pre cat from a spool and emission point of view (quicker turbo response) and it's my guess having the turbo positioned pre cats may be difficult to achieve due to the turbo location on a single turbo system.

I guess there's pros and cons for all types on FI be it single turbo, twin turbo, or supercharging.................not being able to retain the Nissan cats in the factory position may well prove to be the biggest downfall of the large single turbo approach, if CARB approval is considered important.

Peter

APS

Last edited by APS; 09-25-2004 at 02:05 PM.
Old 09-25-2004, 08:57 PM
  #113  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by redline350ZZ
What is the most efficent boost level of this turbo??????

Im the type of customer that would rather have a smaller turbo that optimizes boost at say 6psi and have to upgrade the turbo later......... 650whp or more capability is a waste right now.....

would turbonetics be able to provide me with a smaller turbo in this setup????

I only want 6psi max for the time being.......maybe a year later I would want more......

Im no expert but 360whp with my N/A mods........3.917 gears and 8lb flywheel would be more than enough.....

This is the right F/I path for me right?????
Turbonetics is pretty good about taking care of customer needs. I would contact them to see what they can doo for you. They are certainly willing to help.
Old 09-26-2004, 12:57 AM
  #114  
Brandon@Forged
Sponsor
Forged Internals.com
 
Brandon@Forged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 5,566
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So is the turbo pre-cats, or after cats? I'm just wondering if I will have to custom fab Injen exhaust/race-pipes.
Old 09-26-2004, 04:10 PM
  #115  
redline350ZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
redline350ZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah as soon as I can see a picture of the underneath of the car I can start planing my custom exhaust mod's... I have an Injen exhaust also....

Im still planning on getting headers as of right now... will turnonetics be able to release some info on whether or not headers will hurt there system????
Old 09-26-2004, 05:50 PM
  #116  
basam350z
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
basam350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Come on, what did it put down, otherwise your post was completely useless.


Originally posted by x350Zx
hehehehe I was at the shop that the turbonetics Z got dynod at yesterday.......put down some interesting numbers. I won't say them but I really want to know the price of this thing. the shop owner said it was a really gorgeous kit.
Old 09-26-2004, 08:32 PM
  #117  
Street Visionz, Inc.
Banned
iTrader: (68)
 
Street Visionz, Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: So Cali
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know if turbonetics would appreciate me disclosing it but lets just say it wasn't past 400 but was well over 300. sorry I really don't want to get in trouble w/ turbonetics.
Old 09-26-2004, 09:19 PM
  #118  
ihatethatbobbarker
Registered User
 
ihatethatbobbarker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 4,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i understand secrecy but, when you were told was it under confidence or just out in the open?
Old 09-27-2004, 06:40 AM
  #119  
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well the kit made 409 prior to tuning so it shuold be just south of that.
Old 09-27-2004, 06:41 AM
  #120  
redline350ZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
redline350ZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would be more interested to see how the powerband looks...... from the begining of boost till redline....... Peak power is ok but how does it build up?????


Quick Reply: Turbonetics Single Turbo Kit..Pics/Videos



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:16 PM.