Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

NWP 75mm throttle body

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2013, 06:04 PM
  #61  
denchan350gt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
denchan350gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Owings Mills MD
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 2004Black350z
F that maxima lol. So stock Z tube Into a bigger tb wouldnt be choke point
That max runs low 12's.
Old 07-03-2013, 12:09 AM
  #62  
denchan350gt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
denchan350gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Owings Mills MD
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 2004Black350z
F that maxima lol. So stock Z tube Into a bigger tb wouldnt be choke point
NWP test was a 350z with ztube, cone filter and exhaust. The 15 was with the Z tube.
Old 07-03-2013, 01:08 AM
  #63  
2bad240
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
2bad240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: new bern nc
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

I'm having a seriously hard time believing he gained 15. I just don't see it. Especially with the taper adaptor it's going right back down to 70mm which may increase velocity but I doubt it's helping that much
Old 07-03-2013, 02:28 AM
  #64  
denchan350gt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
denchan350gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Owings Mills MD
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 2bad240
I'm having a seriously hard time believing he gained 15. I just don't see it. Especially with the taper adaptor it's going right back down to 70mm which may increase velocity but I doubt it's helping that much
I think it's gained in the top end for us less fall off after 6200.
Old 07-03-2013, 08:04 AM
  #65  
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Dallas / Chicago
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Received 78 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terrasmak
I have a feeling results are minimal for most, without tuning , quality headers, cams etc etc , you won't see much from this. This also includes the MAF housing.
^+1 (gonna guess tuning and properly sized intake/MAF tube will be more important than some others). I feel like that's how all the discussion regarding this topic (forcing more air into an N/A engine with bolt-ons) over the years has ended. I'm just not seeing how increasing just the overall diameter of the throttle body can increase power if the piping before/after aren't modified. I'm not holding my breath but it'd be nice to be proven wrong.
Old 07-03-2013, 09:14 AM
  #66  
XChacalX
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
XChacalX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
^+1 (gonna guess tuning and properly sized intake/MAF tube will be more important than some others). I feel like that's how all the discussion regarding this topic (forcing more air into an N/A engine with bolt-ons) over the years has ended. I'm just not seeing how increasing just the overall diameter of the throttle body can increase power if the piping before/after aren't modified. I'm not holding my breath but it'd be nice to be proven wrong.
I remember when Sasha told me he gained like 3-5 whp with his bored-out TB by 2mm . and I gained 9+-whp on my twin TB engine by going 2.5mm oversize.
Gaining 15whp from an 5mm increase should be very close to be true but as you said it yourself and what we learned in the pass.
As long as the rest of the exhaust/intake system can flow enough, I say that 15whp gain is possible on the rev-up and/or bigger cams.
Old 07-04-2013, 03:37 AM
  #67  
Fixxxercask
Registered User
iTrader: (21)
 
Fixxxercask's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 1,217
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
^+1 (gonna guess tuning and properly sized intake/MAF tube will be more important than some others). I feel like that's how all the discussion regarding this topic (forcing more air into an N/A engine with bolt-ons) over the years has ended. I'm just not seeing how increasing just the overall diameter of the throttle body can increase power if the piping before/after aren't modified. I'm not holding my breath but it'd be nice to be proven wrong.
I agree for the most part. I think there is still power to be made this way, but not nearly as much or hardly any because of the bottleneck. I know the Titan guys adapted a 90mm TB to their OEM plenum which bottlenecked it and they made around 15whp. They also have two more cylinders.

I am working on a 87mm TB setup right now and the end result will be 4" intake and custom plenum that is the same size as the outlet of the TB so that it doesn't choke back down.
Old 07-04-2013, 07:07 AM
  #68  
3hree5ive0ero
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
 
3hree5ive0ero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Dallas / Chicago
Posts: 1,337,017,813
Received 78 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

^ I've been subscribed to your (and a few other similar) threads. I'm very excited to see your progress and results.

Originally Posted by XChacalX
I remember when Sasha told me he gained like 3-5 whp with his bored-out TB by 2mm . and I gained 9+-whp on my twin TB engine by going 2.5mm oversize.
Gaining 15whp from an 5mm increase should be very close to be true but as you said it yourself and what we learned in the pass.
As long as the rest of the exhaust/intake system can flow enough, I say that 15whp gain is possible on the rev-up and/or bigger cams.
Right, I can understand if the gains were due to the additional flow allowed by cams/tuning. What I don't get is how changing the TB, which is effectively in the middle of a "pipe," allows for gains. Assuming a smooth transition from the differing diameters, wouldn't that just simply decrease the velocity of the air coming in then increase it back to its original velocity? After all, you're not doing anything else to engine to take in more air. If the intake piping from the filter to the TB was also increased to match the TB, then I can see a slight gain from the engine having more access to air. Am I missing something or was the last part of what I said the point of this PnP TB? That is, this mod is for those who are planning on doing extra modifications to their intake tract.
Old 07-04-2013, 08:06 AM
  #69  
XChacalX
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
XChacalX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero

. Am I missing something or was the last part of what I said the point of this PnP TB? That is, this mod is for those who are planning on doing extra modifications to their intake tract.

Totally agree with this.

There will be a limited gain on a lightly to medium modded Z.
Old 07-08-2013, 10:51 AM
  #70  
WetDreamZZZ
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
WetDreamZZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So who bought it now that it has gone on sale?
Old 07-08-2013, 12:42 PM
  #71  
JaE35z
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
JaE35z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,742
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

They all sold out i know someone on here got one...i know one person that got one but he's twin turbo so i'm not looking for his feedback lol, he did mention he didn't need to do the idle air relearn procedure
Old 07-08-2013, 05:37 PM
  #72  
denchan350gt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
denchan350gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Owings Mills MD
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JaE35z
They all sold out i know someone on here got one...i know one person that got one but he's twin turbo so i'm not looking for his feedback lol, he did mention he didn't need to do the idle air relearn procedure
I have the adapter, already had the TB and PNP harness. Did some track tests with a bolt 350z using stock intake and a bolt on maxima with the 4in intake pictured in this thread.

350z did 3 runs stock TB all 3 runs were 14.1@99, was only able to do 1 run with the 75mm 14.05@99 all runs had 2.0 60fts DA was 1500ASL.

Maxima stock TB with 4in intake 14.8@101 with 75mm 14.2@101. I wonder what GG is going to do with his TT setup. I didnt have to do the relearn on either car or mine.
Old 07-08-2013, 05:59 PM
  #73  
JaE35z
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
JaE35z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,742
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by denchan350gt
I have the adapter, already had the TB and PNP harness. Did some track tests with a bolt 350z using stock intake and a bolt on maxima with the 4in intake pictured in this thread.

350z did 3 runs stock TB all 3 runs were 14.1@99, was only able to do 1 run with the 75mm 14.05@99 all runs had 2.0 60fts DA was 1500ASL.

Maxima stock TB with 4in intake 14.8@101 with 75mm 14.2@101. I wonder what GG is going to do with his TT setup. I didnt have to do the relearn on either car or mine.

Old 07-09-2013, 04:20 PM
  #74  
bmyles
Registered User
 
bmyles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seeing that the Maxima didn't increase its trap speed kinda says something about the power...
Old 07-09-2013, 04:51 PM
  #75  
denchan350gt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
denchan350gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Owings Mills MD
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bmyles
Seeing that the Maxima didn't increase its trap speed kinda says something about the power...
actually the maxima did trap 103 with the stock TB, but ran 14.8 in the left lane.

He ran 14.8 2 times in the right lane with the stock TB switched TB's and then ran 14.2@101 2 times in a row. Said it was very noticeable, but he does have a large intake.

He tried the left lane with the 75mm, but had a bad launch.

Same 60fts same lane for both cars. I might go test again on Friday using cipher to measure GM/s between stock and the 75mm.

Last edited by denchan350gt; 07-09-2013 at 04:53 PM.
Old 07-09-2013, 06:08 PM
  #76  
2004Black350z
Exhaust Whore
iTrader: (37)
 
2004Black350z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 10,097
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Or a dyno......
Old 07-09-2013, 09:18 PM
  #77  
MrEous
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
MrEous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Garland (DFW) TX
Posts: 165
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bmyles
Seeing that the Maxima didn't increase its trap speed kinda says something about the power...
Sounds more like traction issues to me. 6/10 of a difference is huge.

Does that track not give other info about the run? Like 60', 1/8th times & trap?
Old 07-10-2013, 02:37 AM
  #78  
denchan350gt
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
denchan350gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Owings Mills MD
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MrEous
Sounds more like traction issues to me. 6/10 of a difference is huge.

Does that track not give other info about the run? Like 60', 1/8th times & trap?
60's were the same. MrEous since you are a maxima owner he has a SSIM (gutted intake manifold) which provides the most for a maxima with this mod supposedly 12+hp.

His bottleneck was the stock TB, this is what Jaypee needs since he is using the stock TB also. He was my original test car, but he didn't come to the track.

Trying to get Hills Garage to dyno test it.
Old 07-10-2013, 03:24 AM
  #79  
MrEous
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
MrEous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Garland (DFW) TX
Posts: 165
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just saying, a 6/10th is a big difference in the quarter mile and have the trap virtually unaffected. A claimed 12whp gain should increase both times and traps. Don't get me wrong, I've been an nwp supporter for awhile, just think the big time difference and no trap difference is strange.

(I have the SSIM as well but consistently ran high 13s with crappy 2.3 60's...trapping 101. This is before 4" intake/maf and any tuning)
Old 07-10-2013, 04:56 AM
  #80  
350Zdj
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
350Zdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Dubai
Posts: 1,914
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I saw NWP's reply to one of the fb posters on their page:

"On the 350z, the gain was over 15hp after 5500rpm without any change on low end. In all our tests, no engine suffered from a loss in low end power"

https://www.facebook.com/NWPEngineering

July 4th post

Subscribed for more results..

Last edited by 350Zdj; 07-10-2013 at 04:59 AM.


Quick Reply: NWP 75mm throttle body



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:04 AM.