Guys, check your Osiris Tuner! We have Torque Management now!
#81
New Member
iTrader: (18)
1.8 60's with 295 R888s, hookin pretty good IMHO
I have a VB that was modified by SGP back some time ago, they were the first to offer it. I have my suspisions that its not as good as the Transgo stuff. I do have a ProTorque converter installed. Im at a loss about this. Your 3-4 is perfect, I may just have to save up for a baller GTM trans I have a spare stock VB, so for the price I think the Transgo stuff is worth a shot. Im due for a fluid change soon anyhow, so thats half the expense right their. I hope its not my clutch packs...
I have a VB that was modified by SGP back some time ago, they were the first to offer it. I have my suspisions that its not as good as the Transgo stuff. I do have a ProTorque converter installed. Im at a loss about this. Your 3-4 is perfect, I may just have to save up for a baller GTM trans I have a spare stock VB, so for the price I think the Transgo stuff is worth a shot. Im due for a fluid change soon anyhow, so thats half the expense right their. I hope its not my clutch packs...
Why are you at a 113 mph trap with a Greddy kit and a built motor? How much boost? You just taking it easy on the 5AT?
Has it always been like this? It looks like the torque converter is not locking up to me. That might explain your trap if you're supposed to be putting down something in the 500 whp range. Does it hold on the dyno?
#82
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Those are good times - I was hoping it was just your tires slipping and not something in your drivetrain.
Why are you at a 113 mph trap with a Greddy kit and a built motor? How much boost? You just taking it easy on the 5AT?
Has it always been like this? It looks like the torque converter is not locking up to me. That might explain your trap if you're supposed to be putting down something in the 500 whp range. Does it hold on the dyno?
Why are you at a 113 mph trap with a Greddy kit and a built motor? How much boost? You just taking it easy on the 5AT?
Has it always been like this? It looks like the torque converter is not locking up to me. That might explain your trap if you're supposed to be putting down something in the 500 whp range. Does it hold on the dyno?
Does Uprev have the ability to control converter lock up like some of the domestic tuners do?
#83
New Member
iTrader: (18)
No UpRev has nothing for TC lock up. Even if it's not locked up the fluid coupling should be so tight that you still gain speed even while rpms stay constant (as the driveshaft spins up to match the speed of the engine). Maybe something is broken in there? Andre at Edge Racing has provided me a couple good converters. Just send him your core and some specs on your car and what kind of stall you are looking for (looser makes for a better launch but is more inefficient at speed). I chose 3k rpms because he would not go any lower. My first GTM t/c was a little mushy around town - stalled about 300-400 rpms higher.
#84
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Actually you do have TC control in Uprev. You ABSOLUTELY have to make sure you're load scaler puts you at 100% any time you're under load -- this is what the TC looks for. By default if you don't change anything, you'll end up at 70% at full boost and the TC never locks up, tranny kaboom.
#85
New Member
iTrader: (18)
Based on an explanation from Jared, my understanding is that "calculated load" is just based on MAF output and my stock MAF max's out early. My calculated load is 100% even on part throttle. It's the reason us 5AT guys cannot get rid of the MAF. Well actually Haltech can generate a fake MAF signal now...
Last edited by rcdash; 02-27-2011 at 08:38 AM.
#86
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
Based on an explanation from Jared, my understanding is that "calculated load" is just based on MAF output and my stock MAF max's out early. My calculated load is 100% even on part throttle. It's the reason us 5AT guys cannot get rid of the MAF. Well actually Haltech can generate a fake MAF signal now...
Could this 4.1v MAF signal be causing the torque converter to not lock up fully like it would at a higher load level with a higher MAF voltage? But wouldnt it show up in all my shifts, not just the 3-4?
#87
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
Based on an explanation from Jared, my understanding is that "calculated load" is just based on MAF output and my stock MAF max's out early. My calculated load is 100% even on part throttle. It's the reason us 5AT guys cannot get rid of the MAF. Well actually Haltech can generate a fake MAF signal now...
#88
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Calculated load is based of of base fuel schedule and RPM. There is a table in Rom editor that u can modify to get a more accurate calculated load. Although I have messed with it dozens of times It hasnt made too much of a difference. I have cars come in that are at 100 calc load at half throttle and some that never hit 100 percent calc load and it doesn't seem to adversely affect it either way.
#89
Vendor - Former Vendor
iTrader: (7)
^^^ I understand that....Let me rephrase..I was actually speaking towards rcdash when he said it was at 100% calc load at half throttle, I have had several vehicles come in like that and it doesnt seem to adversly affect them. On all the Automatic cars I always trim in the calculated load so at full throttle its at 100% the whole time...which usually takes making the base full schedule values lower at higher rpms as torque drops off.
#90
New Member
iTrader: (18)
^ and the base fuel schedule is based off MAF output, correct? It's the reason I couldn't originally get rid of my MAF for my 5AT. A few psi above atm and no issues with overloading that stock MAF. Maybe Jared fixed my tables when I got my original reflash. I sent him my Haltech maps and dyno so he knew what I was up to.
MardiGrasMax, I would log the calculated load in Cipher and make sure it reads 100%!!! Very important for crisp shifts. This affects one of the main clutches in the transmission itself, not the TC (as I understand it).
MardiGrasMax, I would log the calculated load in Cipher and make sure it reads 100%!!! Very important for crisp shifts. This affects one of the main clutches in the transmission itself, not the TC (as I understand it).
Last edited by rcdash; 02-28-2011 at 05:15 AM.
#98
no info specific to the fix (as of now anyway)... just that Derek's 3-4 is now better - but nothing about how it was fixed...
Last edited by CustomGsedan; 02-28-2011 at 06:23 PM.