Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Official STS Rear Mount Turbo Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 06:57 PM
  #141  
Cube's Avatar
Cube
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Sub zero
If you drive a turbo car in the rain you have bigger problems to worry about than a cracked turbo....rwd in the rain FTL
AWD FTW
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #142  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

Been Talking to rick at STS as AthensG suggested and he's very helpful. I'm debating right now whether I should go ahead and do a built shortblock or do the VB, TQ converter and upgrade the turbo to the GT35R which rick says will spool quicker. What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:48 PM
  #143  
goosegoose's Avatar
goosegoose
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Default

If you go the VB/TC route, use an SGP Valve Body and a ProTorque Torque Converter.
I have the Level Ten VB, and while it is an improvement, it still leaves MUCH to be desired.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 12:54 PM
  #144  
athenG's Avatar
athenG
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by danielwebb
Been Talking to rick at STS as AthensG suggested and he's very helpful. I'm debating right now whether I should go ahead and do a built shortblock or do the VB, TQ converter and upgrade the turbo to the GT35R which rick says will spool quicker. What do you guys think?

Good for you, he's really very easy to talk to. If you have the $$$ then I'll definitely do it. I wanted to get the GT35R coz of it's quick spool and decent power and he has a T4 framed GT35 available if you want it. Honestly if I'm going to do a build right now I'll rather work with the STS kit just because of the simplicity of the kit, but my # 1 reason for staying with the STS is because I'm in love with the sound even when I'm just cruising with out boost.

I say talk to Rick more and he'll be more than happy to work with your goals... I did mentioned to him about you and I bet he'll be happy to show the world what the STS can do with a built motor.


Edit:
You just got the kit so I say try to max it first before you jump to a new Turbo/engine build right away... when the time comes to build then Rick has some option for you that will just be a straight drop in with the current kit. But if you have the $$ and can't wait then go all out now and be happy...

Last edited by athenG; Aug 21, 2007 at 01:00 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:12 PM
  #145  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by danielwebb
Been Talking to rick at STS as AthensG suggested and he's very helpful. I'm debating right now whether I should go ahead and do a built shortblock or do the VB, TQ converter and upgrade the turbo to the GT35R which rick says will spool quicker. What do you guys think?
I know hey sell multiple variants of the GT35R so you have some room to work with. I don't think it's quite as simple as just walking in and buying a GT35R.

What is the hot side AR of the particular GT35R turbo you're looking at?
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:21 PM
  #146  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

what he suggested was a gt35r-61
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 01:30 PM
  #147  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by danielwebb
what he suggested was a gt35r-61
When I was looking into them I could have sworn garrett offered it in .63, .82 and 1.06 AR for both the T3 and T4 turbine housings. I'd probably personally choose a T3 housing in either the .82 or .63 ar. If I really had to use a T4 turbine housing I'd definitely go with the smallest ar housing (.63).
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:08 PM
  #148  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

I'm still new on the whole AR housing thing as well as t3 vs t4
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #149  
Cube's Avatar
Cube
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by danielwebb
I'm still new on the whole AR housing thing as well as t3 vs t4
Me too I know nothin about appropriate turbo sizing... all I know is I want the boost quick and not max out the turbo

So what you're sayin athenG is that there's plans for a twin kit drop in-style replacement? Just unbolt the old setup, install new exhaust piping that hooks up to a set of twins and they'll Y-together to the same intake piping?

That's gonna get a lil confusing come time someone uses a true dual, and with the 2 styles of intake piping out there... hmmm...
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:36 PM
  #150  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by taurran
When I was looking into them I could have sworn garrett offered it in .63, .82 and 1.06 AR for both the T3 and T4 turbine housings. I'd probably personally choose a T3 housing in either the .82 or .63 ar. If I really had to use a T4 turbine housing I'd definitely go with the smallest ar housing (.63).
If you want the spool up to even be comparable you'll need a smaller A/R than .63. The current STS kit runs a T4 O trim .59. Any bigger A/R and your spool up will suffer. Ditto for going to a larger trim T4. I'd be interested to see what A/R they use on the GT35 turbo. The only way its going to spool up faster is if they use the same turbine or A/R housing. If they use a T3 turbine with a larger A/R you may get a good spool up but you would need to change the flange as the STS kit comes with a T4 turbine out of box. (albeit a small T4 turbine and A/R)
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #151  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
If you want the spool up to even be comparable you'll need a smaller A/R than .63. The current STS kit runs a T4 O trim .59. Any bigger A/R and your spool up will suffer. Ditto for going to a larger trim T4. I'd be interested to see what A/R they use on the GT35 turbo. The only way its going to spool up faster is if they use the same turbine or A/R housing. If they use a T3 turbine with a larger A/R you may get a good spool up but you would need to change the flange as the STS kit comes with a T4 turbine out of box. (albeit a small T4 turbine and A/R)
Yeah, I have no idea how the kit really feels behind the wheel. I think with any of the options you're going to be making a sacrifice.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 05:09 PM
  #152  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

rick made it sound like the only sacrifice to be made for the gt35 turbo would be $$
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2007 | 05:12 PM
  #153  
taurran's Avatar
taurran
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 9,482
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by danielwebb
rick made it sound like the only sacrifice to be made for the gt35 turbo would be $$
Possibly if you go with a small enough hot side. Never hurts to try it out.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 02:57 AM
  #154  
DanielW's Avatar
DanielW
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,485
Likes: 0
From: Concord, North Carolina
Default

yeah I think I'm going to because I think what I would enjoy more than huge top end right now is a little more bottom and a little more top. I think the tq converter is going to help the bottom as well.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 07:18 AM
  #155  
goosegoose's Avatar
goosegoose
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Default

Originally Posted by Cube
Me too I know nothin about appropriate turbo sizing... all I know is I want the boost quick and not max out the turbo

So what you're sayin athenG is that there's plans for a twin kit drop in-style replacement? Just unbolt the old setup, install new exhaust piping that hooks up to a set of twins and they'll Y-together to the same intake piping?

That's gonna get a lil confusing come time someone uses a true dual, and with the 2 styles of intake piping out there... hmmm...
Wait... what's this about a TWIN drop in upgrade??
Is this speculation/confusion, or is there seriously an upgrade path for this?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 07:36 AM
  #156  
athenG's Avatar
athenG
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

It is just speculation... I was talking about a Drop-in Turbo that you can just do a swap with the current unit, that's all. Let us not get carried away until we actually see the STS ST go on sale


Goosegoose, how is the car going along?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 07:42 AM
  #157  
goosegoose's Avatar
goosegoose
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Default

Originally Posted by athenG
It is just speculation... I was talking about a Drop-in Turbo that you can just do a swap with the current unit, that's all. Let us not get carried away until we actually see the STS ST go on sale


Goosegoose, how is the car going along?
My setup needs some serious fixing.
On my 8psi boost map, I can only build a max of 5psi.

I have a huge exhaust leak between my mid pipe and the first STS exhaust pipe that replaces the OEM muffler. I will have a new gasket for that soon which will hopefully plug this leak up.

Also, my intake pipe is seriously dented in about 1.5 inches at one point.
I can't wait to get the old setup out of there and finally put in the new intake pipes up the center. That initial design is NOT GOOD AT ALL for NYC ROADS.

I should be having all this work done on Saturday, in addition to having all the heat wrapping finished up. By then, maybe the car will be running normally again, and I'll finally be able to do some UTEC/AFR logging with MPS.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 08:19 AM
  #158  
athenG's Avatar
athenG
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally Posted by goosegoose
My setup needs some serious fixing.
On my 8psi boost map, I can only build a max of 5psi.

I have a huge exhaust leak between my mid pipe and the first STS exhaust pipe that replaces the OEM muffler. I will have a new gasket for that soon which will hopefully plug this leak up.

Also, my intake pipe is seriously dented in about 1.5 inches at one point.
I can't wait to get the old setup out of there and finally put in the new intake pipes up the center. That initial design is NOT GOOD AT ALL for NYC ROADS.

I should be having all this work done on Saturday, in addition to having all the heat wrapping finished up. By then, maybe the car will be running normally again, and I'll finally be able to do some UTEC/AFR logging with MPS.


Great, are you using the XD-16 for you AF gauge? are you logging through the serial out of that? I need to find the damn wires so I can start logging my AF with Utec
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 08:24 AM
  #159  
goosegoose's Avatar
goosegoose
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: New York City
Default

Originally Posted by athenG
Great, are you using the XD-16 for you AF gauge? are you logging through the serial out of that? I need to find the damn wires so I can start logging my AF with Utec
I'm using the innovate XD-16 gauge paired with the LC-1 controller. It is innovate's all-in-one AFR gauge system. I had to re-wire and re-mount the whole thing myself, but I am now quite happy with it.

I've tested it with the serial connection, and everything seems to work great. I also ran a trial with MPS 3.0 last night, and that seems to work well too.

Since I need to RMA my UTEC anyway, I am going to plug a USB cable directly into the UTEC, and see if the logging works that way.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2007 | 10:29 AM
  #160  
TegraRacer134's Avatar
TegraRacer134
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Default

Originally Posted by goosegoose
My setup needs some serious fixing.
On my 8psi boost map, I can only build a max of 5psi.

I have a huge exhaust leak between my mid pipe and the first STS exhaust pipe that replaces the OEM muffler. I will have a new gasket for that soon which will hopefully plug this leak up.

Also, my intake pipe is seriously dented in about 1.5 inches at one point.
I can't wait to get the old setup out of there and finally put in the new intake pipes up the center. That initial design is NOT GOOD AT ALL for NYC ROADS.

I should be having all this work done on Saturday, in addition to having all the heat wrapping finished up. By then, maybe the car will be running normally again, and I'll finally be able to do some UTEC/AFR logging with MPS.
Yeah I have the same exhaust leak as well I need to get a new gasket.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:06 PM.